Maths and English are binary opposites. English allows the profession of individual ideas, whilst Maths does not. Whoever's initial juxtaposition of the two for the purpose of comparative theory must have a a mindset that is utterly cold, like that of Maths. You exhibit a case of severe narrow-mindedness, unable to make any sense about what the English subject is all about.
Actually, maths is all about ideas as well. There are many ways/ideas to solve the same problem in maths and you are able to express them on paper.Going by what you said, only narrow minded people can do maths. But if that is the case, how could new formulas etc etc be developed if individuals did not try to "think outside of the square" and search for new expressions and ideas?
u serious? best you could come up with?
you might want to turn that UAI aim upside down, it seems more likely
Ah, the troll is insulting my insult despite his initial insult being an extremely lamer one.
Even if i did, it'd probably be more than you'd ever get.
Now let's get back on topic instead of just flaming each other:
Those who did 2 or more related texts: You guys did the wrong thing so get over it. Whether you get penalised or not it won't that much of a difference seeing as it will probably be horrible in the 1st place as you guys didn't have enough of a brain to properly interpret the question. Just stop making excuses so everyone can move on.
Those who did only text: You'll probably get a better mark. Even though BoS says they won't penalise or say marks will only read the 1st related, they probably will anyway and even if they don't, the ones that did more than 1 text will probably be substandard anyway.