• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Calculating WAM (1 Viewer)

Winston

Active Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2002
Messages
6,128
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Minai said:
Just as I thought. WAM doesn't take into account year or whatever at UNSW However it appears so for CSE? Hmm
But why wouldn't year be a crucial factor, i mean every year differs in difficulty by at least a portion right, hey you told me that too you nugget! :p
 

maniacguy

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
223
Year is not a crucial factor because whilst later year subjects are more difficult, you are assumed to have been better prepared for them than for earlier subjects, so in relative terms all is good.

An example of this relative stability is inflation - if your wages rise by 10% but inflation is 10% then in real terms nothing has changed. Similarly for WAM your ability has increased over time.

I suspect that in CSE they use the other because for the purposes they use it for it's more important that you know the later year stuff, so they don't really care if you've forgotten whatever you did in Comp 1A back in first year if you can still do all the stuff from third year.
 

McLake

The Perfect Nerd
Joined
Aug 14, 2002
Messages
4,187
Location
The Shire
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Note CSE WAM is primarily used to assign honours and award medals
 

gman03

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
1,283
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
in EE&T, it is the year of the course, not the year of the program matters..

for example, COMP1021 has a weighting of 1X, but we do them in 2nd year semester one.

Likewise I would probably doing some MATH2XXX course during my 3rd year, but will have a weighting of 2X, not three times..
 

Minai

Alumni
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
7,458
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Uni Grad
2006
Well, from that, USyd seems to take into account the academic level when calculating the WAM
 

jase_

Moderator Jase
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
3,039
Location
St. Clair
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
UTS does use the WAM to calculate the final grade for your course, if applicable (such as Pass, Credit or Distinction degree). Most of the time, your first year core subjects and any elective subjects are excluded (but its different for each course!).

So for my old course (BSc in IT), only the 2nd and 3rd year CORE IT subjects would be included in the WAM calculation to work out the final grade for the course.

As for my new course, the Computing side is the same as above. As for Business, I'm not too sure, but I believe its only your major subjects and not the first year core subjects, but I'll have to check on that.

I'll have to check about the "year" thing at UTS in terms of WAM, but I don't think they would use it at UTS, considering my above example. The core IT subjects are spread across a number of different IT courses, and a particular subject could be done in either 3rd, 4th, 5th or even 6th year depending on your course. Same goes for my Accounting major. I can pretty much do the subjects in any order provided I meet the prerequisites and there is not much stopping me in terms of that so people are doing different major subjects who are in the same major each year, so it would unfair to use a "year" thing in that sense since some people could be penalised for doing harder subjects in an earlier year, or vice versa.
 

jase_

Moderator Jase
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
3,039
Location
St. Clair
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Okiez well using the formula with the "years" I got a WAM of 80.125 for my first 2 years of subjects.

Using the formula that I stated without the years, which is the same as above, but no years, I got a WAM of 80.5. It doesn't seem to make much of a difference to me.
 

Lexicographer

Retired 13 May 2006
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
8,275
Location
Darnassus ftw
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
The term "year" is misleading here. When I used it I was referring to the stage at which the sunbject is considered, so Chemistry 2 is taught in stage two of a normal physical sciences degree (ie second semester of first year). Disregarding for a moment the fact that it's a first year core subject, its weighting would be 1 (even though people taking it as part of a second major may have this subject in third year) because of its difficulty and position on the course ladder.

Anyway, I can see now what the WAM really refers to. It's like a GPA that is calculated with your raw subject marks rather than your GPA band ranks, allowing for a more accurate final award calculation.
 

jase_

Moderator Jase
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
3,039
Location
St. Clair
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Alrighty well with my example, there are many courses which have majors in them, such as Business. You can't really then classify subjects into their "difficulty and position on the course ladder" though.
 

McLake

The Perfect Nerd
Joined
Aug 14, 2002
Messages
4,187
Location
The Shire
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Marks out today confirm "year" has nothing to do with WAM @ UNSW.
 

Minai

Alumni
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
7,458
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Uni Grad
2006
McLake said:
Marks out today confirm "year" has nothing to do with WAM @ UNSW.
Yes, I was going to post that myself
 

aspect

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
74
i think the weighted term refers to number of units

ie those with 3 units instead of 6 weigh less in the calculation
 

Lexicographer

Retired 13 May 2006
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
8,275
Location
Darnassus ftw
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
You can't do it directly from WAM to GPA, you need to go back to your academic transcript and see what your individual subject marks were.
 

gman03

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
1,283
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
McLake said:
Marks out today confirm "year" has nothing to do with WAM @ UNSW.
myself have realised there are two type of WAM: flat WAM and faculty WAM... former one does not care bout "year"
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top