MarsBarz said:
Yeah lol, I rekon the way I first did it was much simpler.
Its exactly the same method
The only difference is when you got up to:
dx/dy = 1/(2y)
You integrated straight away, when deep down you (not you personally but I mean everyone in general) are skipping the step dx = 1/(2y)dy, which is something that almost everyone naturally does as its obvious.
Edit: also when you integrate you do: lny + K= 2x + C
This isnt necessary, the constant only has to appear on one side, ie write it as ln y = 2x + C. Reason:
If lny + K = 2x + C, then lny = 2x + (C - K), and C - K is a constant, which we'll call D. Thus lny = 2x + D, which is what you couldve started with the begin with.
Technically, when you integrated dx/dy = 1/(2y), if you were to follow the same thing as above, you'd get x + K = 1/2 ln(y) + C, which again, is not necessary.