I'm confused about the concept of natural justice, is it just the same as procedural fairness ? Would this be a correct definition: the right to be heard by a court that is non-biased and a person's right to know what is alleged against them
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Definition for natural justice (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter xibu34
- Start date
Procedural justice is also known as natural justice, meaning that both terms are used interchangeably.
If we compare your definition of natural justice to that of the Australian Human Rights Commission, being:
I hope this helps!
If we compare your definition of natural justice to that of the Australian Human Rights Commission, being:
"The accepted notion of natural justice in this country is that everyone is entitled to a decision by a disinterested and unbiased adjudicator; and that the parties shall be given adequate notice of the case against them, and a right to respond."
We can deduce that your definition of natural justice is correct and that you could possibly expand your definition to not only being heard, but also being judged in the same unbiased manner in which a party is heard, in addition to not only being informed of the case against a particular party, but also being given a right to respond.
I hope this helps!