Guys idk what to do. I got my eco marks and I got 31/35 and the highest was 32. Im still rank 1 but the gap is now obviously closer. However this is because they wrote a question "how do movements in the exchange rate influence trade prices and interest rates", to which I wrote about rapid appreciation causes RBA intervention through cash rate manipulation..., and trade prices may fall due to a lack of demand if AUD is too high... HOWEVER I got 1/4. Total BS. Instead the ppl that wrote about it the other way around; that is, trade prices being high causes the AUD demand to fall... and low interest rates too... and yet they got 4/4. And when I told the marker this she simply said, "But we inteded the other so I marked according to the sample answer". Now how is it my fault for answering the question correct? Is there any way to appeal this and have it remarked because this is beyond unfair and plain stupidity by my school. I honestly could not care less what the examiner "intended" im gonna answer the question on my frickin question paper!
Im honestly bout done with this teacher.
Im honestly bout done with this teacher.
