Well , if you did mention that in the first place that this was an assessment task (which your class seriously should have completed already. You were meant to do it in Term 4, if I recall correctly) this could all have been avoided.
I recant my previous views of your teacher though your class should have already completed your assessment task for WW1 in Term Four of last year. One thing to note also, if you do find a kick ass primary source, it means nothing if you can't analyse it and put it into context.
You did? Good, give me the website or the publishing details of the book that the document is in. The reason why? I really doubt that you did; I have never seen an official government document before about the stalemate, only that of military commanders who thought it a temporary phrase that will be passed in new offensives in the New Year that would hopefully continue mobile warfare. Hell even the French rushed it and attacked the Germans in the First Battle of Champagne in December 1914 in an attempt to commence mobile warfare.
There is no need for the insults. They are unwarranted; in reading my previous posts I cannot see any provocative comments that I may have made towards you (and if I did, I apologise for making them). I was trying to help you; I thought you were one of those over the board students who go on wasting their valuable time looking for sources to practise off in the supposition that they will get better marks in source-related questions. In a way, this method will help in earning better marks in improving your source analysis skills but if you don't have any background knowledge to reinforce your response, what the hell are you going to write for Question 2 and 3 in the HSC exam section of World War One to reinforce your answers?
You need background knowledge with sources. You should be reading as many books as you can instead of wasting your time trying to find just one kick-ass 'government document' in a source-related task, that has many other valuable primary and secondary sources available for you to use, in order to just make your history teacher go 'oooo'.
For historians, check out John Keegan's 'The First World War', Peter Simkins 'World War One' (published by Osprey, it's actually written by a couple more authors but their contributions to the book are not concentrated towards the Western Front), H.P Willmott's 'World War One' and A.J.P Taylor's 'The Illustrated History of the First World War'. Also have a look at the following wikipedia article-
Schlieffen Plan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For each of the quoted historian comments follow the superscript hyperlink at the end of the quote which will lead you to the reference details for you to reference your quote since many prejudiced people still believe that wikipedia is 'an unreliable resource' which it is not (in regards to history articles that no one in our generation gives a toss about. Other articles about other things, worry).