Mitcho1989
\m/ Rock on \m/
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 23
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2007
man WTF?? that pic is fuckin stupid and ridiculously nerdyStarcraftmazter said:
youre weird
man WTF?? that pic is fuckin stupid and ridiculously nerdyStarcraftmazter said:
Mitcho1989 said:man WTF?? that pic is fuckin stupid and ridiculously nerdy
youre weird
thankyou!!! hahasbhandula said:Sdd Sucks!
Because before you start coding any serious program, you need to set out it's logic. Pseudocode is good for doing that, and is non-language specific - ie. can be converted into any language.Pincus said:The main thing which shits me is pseudo code. Why bother with pseudo code, when you can do it in a c-like language? It looks 1000 times better, and far easier to read.
We have a saying in this game I play, "if you want to have a war with someone, you can't run at them naked with your dick flapping in the air. You need to plan, plan - and plan some more.".Pincus said:I expected it to be a fun subject, but unfortunately there appears to be more designing than developing.
I know, and i'm not saying the planning is bad, but the fake pseudo language used. I get sick of the begin, end etc instead of { }. I didn't mean skip the planning and implement it in a real language immediately.Starcraftmazter said:Because before you start coding any serious program, you need to set out it's logic. Pseudocode is good for doing that, and is non-language specific - ie. can be converted into any language.
Believe me, pseudocode is a very very useful way of expressing complex algorithms in simple ways.
Yeah, no doubt, i'm just saying we should do more developing than designing. I know people who have done SDD, and have got little to no programming experience out of it, which just sucks. I suppose it depends on the teacher.Starcraftmazter said:The most important aspect of making programs, is designing them. Otherwise it runs into a titanic mess long before you can finish it.
True, I dislike that too. But really, pseducode is so simple, it's not crucial, because you can summarise many functions or lines of code by making stuff up.Pincus said:I know, and i'm not saying the planning is bad, but the fake pseudo language used. I get sick of the begin, end etc instead of { }. I didn't mean skip the planning and implement it in a real language immediately.
IMO, if you want to do programming, it's best to do it on your own during HS (in addition to SDD, that is). From having just done my first semester at university, they tech everything about programming from ground up here, assuming no prior knowledge.Pincus said:Yeah, no doubt, i'm just saying we should do more developing than designing. I know people who have done SDD, and have got little to no programming experience out of it, which just sucks. I suppose it depends on the teacher.
I'm pretty sure it's some kind of an unofficial standard to do visual basic. Pretty much everyone whom I know did VB for SDD in HS.me121 said:I just looked at the content section, and does the syllabus say you even need to learn a programming language at all?
my philosophy is if you ever think a subject is too easy, then you arn't trying hard enough.mythical chaos said:SDD is one of the easiest subjects on the planet!
He sounds like a pretty good teacher, and the industry experience is a huge bonus. Shame he is retiring.Patar said:Well, I like our software course. The syllabus doesnt say anything about actual programming but well... you can apply all your theoretical knowledge of the course outside school.
I like learning it because we have the honour of having someone who knows what he's talking about - Allan Fowler, he's worked in the industry for years and wrote the Heinemann textbooks for the Preliminary and HSC course of Software Design and Development.
He makes the lessons interesting, and when he's teaching the stuff he links it to relevant stuff like "I was working on a project where this happened," etc, and you feel like there's a point to what's being said.
It's a shame he's retiring when we leave, he's seeing us out until the end of Term 3.
Mr Fowler said the way the course works is that you should be able to apply its generic knowledge to learn any programming language.