It looks like a galvanic cell (ie voltmetre)Necros87 said:well i think its a galvanic cell
isnt Fe2+ supposed to be flipped around since it is the one on top, therefore the one being oxidised, therefore, having its half equation being flipped over?Necros87 said:well i think its a galvanic cell, maybe not... i havnt heard of it as spontanious before
b) *gets e^0 table out*
Fe2+(aq) + 2e --> Fe(s) -0.44V
Cu(s) --> Cu2+(aq) + 2e -0.34V (fliped round)
-----------------------------------------
Cu(s) +Fe2+(aq) --> Fe(s) + Cu2+(aq) -0.78 (electrons canceled)
therefore, the voltage required is 0.78V
what do you think it means?serge said:It looks like a galvanic cell (ie voltmetre)
but they tell you its acting as an electrolytic cell?
does electrolytic mean what i think it means?
well i was hoping the 'but' would explain itrnitya_25 said:what do you think it means?
yeh the diagram doesnt help at allrnitya_25 said:ok cool........im feeling wierd......
thats what i thought but i could be wrongrama_v said:Yeah, what they want is for the reaction to go the other way
So if you in this instance instead of Iron oxidising you want copper to oxidise, and iron to reduce. So the reactions required are
Fe2+ + 2e- ->Fe(s) -0.44V
and Cu(s) -> Cu2+ + 2e- -0.34V
So you would need to pump 0.78 V into the cell to get teh reaction to go in the opposite direction, right??
Yep, I've got success one right in front of meserge said:yeh the diagram doesnt help at all
adding a voltmeter for no reason?
its from the 2002 HSC
anyone with a 2003-2005 success book
should know the answer i think
thats what i thought but i could be wrong
I think when you 'pump' it in the voltage still
counts as negative
yay, case closedrama_v said:Yep, I've got success one right in front of me
It says "To operate the cell as an electrolytic cell the current would need to be reversed. It would take more than 0.78V in the opposite direction"