• We have a few events lined up for the October school holidays!
    Watch this space...

Extracurricular Elementary Mathematics Marathon (1 Viewer)

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
I'm doubt the validity of my solution, and I'm certain there are massive logical gaps, but here's what I have:

Yeah, you have done something fishy in deducing that f=f^{-1}, care to explain your reasoning if you still believe this fact after thinking more?

Note also that you have used continuity nowhere. This is essential, as we have a vast array of solutions to the functional equation if continuity is not required:

Partition the reals into an uncountable union of sets, each with either 1 or 3 elements.
Define f to map elements of singleton sets to themselves and to cycle the three elements in each of the other sets.

Any such function f will satisfy the functional equation, but almost all of them will be highly discontinuous.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Composition cannot create parity? Why not? Eg f(x)=1-x is not odd or even, but composed with itself is the identity which is odd.

It is true that the only polynomial function that works is the identity and yes degree considerations give you this quickly as you note.

This isn't too fruitful a way of thinking about what general continuous functions can solve the equation though.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,454
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Composition cannot create parity? Why not? Eg f(x)=1-x is not odd or even, but composed with itself is the identity which is odd.

It is true that the only polynomial function that works is the identity and yes degree considerations give you this quickly as you note.

This isn't too fruitful a way of thinking about what general continuous functions can solve the equation though.
No discontinuities allowed, this includes singularities of rational functions? for example, 1/(1-x) is clearly a solution to the functional equation, but has a simple pole at x=1
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
No discontinuities allowed, this includes singularities of rational functions? for example, 1/(1-x) is clearly a solution to the functional equation, but has a simple pole at x=1
No, singularities are not allowed, because the function is continuous and has domain R. (We cannot have any domain "holes".)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top