Originally posted by Seraph
yea the roosters fans were being tossers as well , some of them actually started the fighting
Originally posted by CasaNovo
THe roosters did provoke and start trouble. Not all their fault but they were FAR from innocent.
One reason, a roosters fan ran past a bulldogs supporter and ripped off her headpiece/headress (female).
And the incident with the roosters fan having a bloody face, he actually threw the first punch, but then got decked.
Takes TWO.
thats what ive heard, the bulldog supporters are no doubt guilty of fighting, but the roosters supporters arent innocent.
on top of what casanova said, ive heard that roosters fans actually pissed on a few bulldog supporters.
so if all this is true, then some roosters supporters actually wanted a fight, they got what they wanted and alot more. however i feel no sympathy for the brawlers
I can act like some ppl who judge doggies supporters and assume every roosters fan pisses on ppl and attacks young girls, but i choose not to act like those ppl
Originally posted by Loz#1
I would never choose Brent Sherwin from the Dogs.
Originally posted by Misturi
Me neither, he's old .
Originally posted by Loz#1
Not only that, he's from the Dogs. And the way their team is going, I don't think their players should be chosen to represent the state
well firstly, he's just turned 26, so if thats old then i dunno what u call Johns whos turning 30 this year
and he himself isn't in trouble, its the club. if the trouble was on him and only him i might agree with u, but its not.
remember when craig gower exposed himself to a woman and got selected for australia, and when robbie o'davies played for qld after a positive drug ban, so i think selectin a player in crisis is worse than selecting a player from a club thats in crisis
but neway i dont think sherwin will get selected for NSW, i think its between craig gower and brett kimmorley