FORMAL APOLOGY 2 all UWS students (2 Viewers)

[HerO_Reborned]

hero, you say you've learnt from your mistaktes, show it by not being argumentative for the sake of it.

Its not important, let it go!

starting with the insults all over again is just gonna lead to you getting banned again.

But OMG Nat needs some SERIOUS disciplining cuz I can see her being a murderer someday.

 

[LaraB]

But OMG Nat needs some SERIOUS disciplining cuz I can see her being a murderer someday.

no, she doesnt..

and even if she did, you have no right to assume you should be doing it

someone not liking you and disagreeing with you does not equate to them being a murderer.

Just shut up, get over it, move on.

No one cares and if you really are over your argumentative immaturity as you expressed in your apology, you would realise that this is pointless spamming that no one want and you shuold juts stop!

 

[HerO_Reborned]

no, she doesnt..

and even if she did, you have no right to assume you should be doing it

someone not liking you and disagreeing with you does not equate to them being a murderer.

Just shut up, get over it, move on.

No one cares and if you really are over your argumentative immaturity as you expressed in your apology, you would realise that this is pointless spamming that no one want and you shuold juts stop!

Ok Lara Beach, but 1 more thing, I would have 2 disagree 2 ur claim that this is pointless spamming as i'm trying 2 establish whether or not the ppl i'm apologising are forgiving me or not so this is indeed quite a valid convo.

 

[Arvin Sloane]

Ok Lara Beach, but 1 more thing, I would have 2 disagree 2 ur claim that this is pointless spamming as i'm trying 2 establish whether or not the ppl i'm apologising are forgiving me or not so this is indeed quite a valid convo.

So do I get your organs or not?!

I must know! The pants command me, THE PANTS!

 

[LaraB]

Ok Lara Beach, but 1 more thing, I would have 2 disagree 2 ur claim that this is pointless spamming as i'm trying 2 establish whether or not the ppl i'm apologising are forgiving me or not so this is indeed quite a valid convo.

i said its pointless spamming as nat has already said what she thinks of your apology so there is not need to start an argument over it as her p.o.v is very clear.

As i said - you should apologise because its th right thing to do, not because you expect acceptance/forgiveness. We have no obligation to accept any apology from you or anyon and you can't expect that people will.

All your argument/conversation will do is start another argument (and befor eyou say it, no it wont be all nat's fault because you instigated it).

Its unnecessary and if you do honestly want a 'fresh start" you'd learn when to just get over it as it clearly isnt getting you anywhere/

 

[HerO_Reborned]

i said its pointless spamming as nat has already said what she thinks of your apology so there is not need to start an argument over it as her p.o.v is very clear.

As i said - you should apologise because its th right thing to do, not because you expect acceptance/forgiveness. We have no obligation to accept any apology from you or anyon and you can't expect that people will.

All your argument/conversation will do is start another argument (and befor eyou say it, no it wont be all nat's fault because you instigated it).

Its unnecessary and if you do honestly want a 'fresh start" you'd learn when to just get over it as it clearly isnt getting you anywhere/

Alrighty, 1 more thing, do u like ur surname cuz doesn't it suck when some1 calls ur name and it sounds as if they're calling u Lara Bitch, instead of Lara Beach lol

 

[LaraB]

Alrighty, 1 more thing, do u like ur surname cuz doesn't it suck when some1 calls ur name and it sounds as if they're calling u Lara Bitch, instead of Lara Beach lol

uh no... it sounds exactly like they've said it...

 

[GTR]

Hero, who gives a fuck if Natstar hasn't achknowledged [sic] your apology?
Many of us, including you, have cited that Natstar's post mostly consist of SPAM material anyway. So in other words, you can treat Natstar as a bot that posts advertisements for Viagra and free diploma's on different forums. This is especially true if you cite the "constructive posts" Natstar has contributed to these forums. I will be happy to quote some of them again in this thread for everyone to emulate.

starting with the insults all over again is just gonna lead to you getting banned again.

Wow! I am sure Hero is trembling with fear at the prospect of getting banned AGAIN. Note how easy it was for him to start up another account within this forum.

 

[Shuter]

Wow! I am sure that its going to be hell easy for him to start a new account when they ban his IP address.

Yes, seeing as almost all internet accounts in Australia run on dynamic IP addresses......

Seriously why do you bother posting? You just get made the fool of constantly.

 

[Jacks]

natstar is an extremely helpful member of the BOS community...she's been really helpful to me and a lot of other people, especially on the UWS forum. If she wasn't a helpful member her application to become a benefactor would not have been approved. I thought since no one had replied to this thread for a couple of days that we had all decided to be decent people and move on...personal attacks on natstar or any other member should not be a feature of this forum...

 

[HerO]

natstar is an extremely helpful member of the BOS community...she's been really helpful to me and a lot of other people, especially on the UWS forum. If she wasn't a helpful member her application to become a benefactor would not have been approved. I thought since no one had replied to this thread for a couple of days that we had all decided to be decent people and move on...personal attacks on natstar or any other member should not be a feature of this forum...

She being a benefactor doesn't appeal the slightest 2 most ppl, having that tag doesn't always mean ur helpful, in Nat's case i would have 2 say she is really biased in everything she says, if some1 says something that doesn't reflect her own views and opinions then she thinks of it as junk.

What makes it worse is she abuses her "benefactor" tag by reporting members who is absolutely correct and have valid arguments but if the reasonable arguments doesn't reflect her own views then it's seen 2 be bad posts so she goes on a reporting rampage.
I even question the whole BOS administration, I seriously believe it's a corrupted organisation, if they aren't then I wouldn't of been banned in the first place. The MODS tends 2 be one-eyed, they don't even take into account any reasonable defence I have put in 4 myself, all they did was listen 2 Nat bitch and rant about absolute rubbish

 

[Cape]

I've found natstar to be extremely helpful, just like Jacks said.

If you have a problem with her, don't post it up in threads. Its annoying for people who actaully want to use the board for the purpose that it was made for.

Hero, if you have such a problem with natstar, don't read her posts, or leave. Don't go bagging her out, she has done nothing wrong.

Most of us have better things to do with out lives than to read personal attacks to specific members of the board.

 

[HerO]

I've found natstar to be extremely helpful, just like Jacks said.

If you have a problem with her, don't post it up in threads. Its annoying for people who actaully want to use the board for the purpose that it was made for.

Hero, if you have such a problem with natstar, don't read her posts, or leave. Don't go bagging her out, she has done nothing wrong.

Most of us have better things to do with out lives than to read personal attacks to specific members of the board.

Cape how about taking my side 4 once and say that i'm justifiably correct, I know u wouldn't wanna offend Nat since she's like a mother figure of UWS but seriously at least be neutral if ur not gonna take my side.

 

[Arvin Sloane]

Most of us have better things to do with out lives than to read personal attacks to specific members of the board.

Speak for yourself!

 

[Jonathan A]

She being a benefactor doesn't appeal the slightest 2 most ppl, having that tag doesn't always mean ur helpful, in Nat's case i would have 2 say she is really biased in everything she says, if some1 says something that doesn't reflect her own views and opinions then she thinks of it as junk.

What makes it worse is she abuses her "benefactor" tag by reporting members who is absolutely correct and have valid arguments but if the reasonable arguments doesn't reflect her own views then it's seen 2 be bad posts so she goes on a reporting rampage.
I even question the whole BOS administration, I seriously believe it's a corrupted organisation, if they aren't then I wouldn't of been banned in the first place. The MODS tends 2 be one-eyed, they don't even take into account any reasonable defence I have put in 4 myself, all they did was listen 2 Nat bitch and rant about absolute rubbish

Hero, I said earlier that you had the right to be here, but so does Natstar. Natstar is a proven helpful member of the community, devoting some of her time to the willing students here.

Hero I commend you on your ability to apologise, it certainly is a good gesture, and one I would certainly consider and acknowledge. However mate, the idea here is to move on. It makes no one any happier if we simply start this all over again. It's just pointless, you don't achieve anything. The people you attack or vindicate, are persons who are held with such high regard, there is no point arguing at all over this as it is only motivated by outrage and some form of vegeance, it wont end.

So, again, my advice is simply move on. If you think that our approach as a collective is harsh, then let me offer it to you in a diplomatic manner in your interests as well, simply just ignore this part of the community and allow those who are willing and interested in good faith to continue.

Thank you

 

[LaraB]

Hero, I said earlier that you had the right to be here, but so does Natstar. Natstar is a proven helpful member of the community, devoting some of her time to the willing students here.

Hero I commend you on your ability to apologise, it certainly is a good gesture, and one I would certainly consider and acknowledge. However mate, the idea here is to move on. It makes no one any happier if we simply start this all over again. It's just pointless, you don't achieve anything. The people you attack or vindicate, are persons who are held with such high regard, there is no point arguing at all over this as it is only motivated by outrage and some form of vegeance, it wont end.

So, again, my advice is simply move on. If you think that our approach as a collective is harsh, then let me offer it to you in a diplomatic manner in your interests as well, simply just ignore this part of the community and allow those who are willing and interested in good faith to continue.

Thank you

lol ditto