MedVision ad

General Maths Paper Q23. c) (1 Viewer)

Dj MuNgAs!

Old Skool
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
9
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
does anyone know the answer to 23 part c, the question about the height of the tree? And how do u figure out the answer for it?
 

matty_boi17

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
54
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I'm pretty sure this is wrong, but I assumed the angle opposite the right angle in the smaller triangle was 45 degrees, and then just used trig to work it out:

tan 45 = h/5m
h = tan 45 * 5
h = 5m
 

Skeeta

Active Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
NSW
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
they are similar triangles

so you do a ration thing...

2:5 = 2.7: x

it ends up being about 6.75 i think
 

a_person86

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
142
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Ok, this was a tricky one.

basically with had to make the comparisons between the triangles

i did:

2/5 = 2.7/h Cross multiply

2h=13.5 divide by two
h=6.75
 

Dj MuNgAs!

Old Skool
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
9
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
ok tnx, cause i guessed sumfin along those lines cause i didnt know how 2 do it. I put 6.7 sumfin like dat. i just checked my calculator & i put 6.75 but i was a guess. as i just times 2.7 * 2 or sumfin like dat.
 

dezzy

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Messages
631
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
i thought the smaller triangle was a shrinked version of the large triangle so i used my thinking cap and came up with the thesis that if i double the height of the smaller triangle and add one, i will get the height of the tree BECAUSE the measurements on the base of the little triangle was 2cm right? the base of the WHOLE triangle was 5cm...this means that by doubling the base of the small triangle and adding one, i will get 5...therefore proving my thesis!!! haha
 

em_516

bludging..
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
3,487
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
hmm..i think i might have stuffed it then..

i did:

3/2 * 2.7 = 4.05m

because i used 3/2 as the scale factor..
 

maka

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
468
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
em i got the same

used the englarment ratio thinga nd got 4.05
 

em_516

bludging..
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
3,487
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
maka said:
em i got the same

used the englarment ratio thinga nd got 4.05
haha..and we're wrong..damn stupid mistakes! it should have been 5/2..grrr..
 

will_17

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Messages
12
I found out the percentage at which 2 inceased to 3 adn then used that percentage to increase the hieght of the small triangle and it ended up being 6.75 or somehting. I winged that question...
 

IP_freely

evo 9 ftw
Joined
Nov 16, 2003
Messages
368
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
its 6.75 an if u still cant get it go to the Yr 11 New century maths book it will tell u how to work it out
 

pussy_cat

Hyper
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
219
Location
Parramatta
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
I figured out the angle using the small triangle then used the angle and one side, and cos to get the height, dont think i got the right answer, but gotta get marks for tryin lol
 

maka

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
468
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
em i was just gonna say after lookin over the paper the easiest question of the paper and i drop a mark on it it was 5/2 with a rough answer on 6 like ppl have been sayin
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top