Anyone found it difficult to relate the global economy to balance of goods and services?
Nope, talk about the rise in Asian growth through their manufacturing supremacy (especially in China) lead to a surge in the demand for commodities from australia. This demand meant australia's Export quantities increase, demand also meant that prices went up for iron ore and minerals - led to highest ToT in 140 years (130.5 in sep 11) and therefore we started seeing surpluses in our trade balances which then meant modest surpluses in the BOGS. Further, i also highlighted the future possible decline in investment (when talking about NPI), when Glenn Stevens announced in his media release 'peak in resource sector investment likely to occur next year' and related that back to supposed decline in future NPI's
BUT OVERALL, really happy with the test, dunno - but it looks like they set it out straight forward knowing that it would be the exam straight after english or something...(they do the timetable and exams at the same time)
Except for that last essay about economic objectives, which i found too broad and ended up going into 15 pages and not going into too much detail, im looking for high band 5 - band 6.
I'd rather it be easy, than a crazy hard test that wouldve ruined my view on economics forever. Not so rewarding for those, like me, who spent days studying topics like environmental stability and market based policies for environment specific essays.
Also, nothing about case study in short answer, made life so easy.
Pretty happy in the end! Goodluck to everyone who didn't study for bio because of eco...atleast you can go in knowing you did well in eco