Global warming occuring faster than predicted (2 Viewers)

[impervious182]

Trefoil and Kwayera, your both so ignorant that it's sad.

Fixed.

Sorry about the mistake, Kwayera. Next time I'll remember to include you too.

 

[Kwayera]

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm

 

[Kwayera]

What's more, the world hasn't warmed since 1998.

That's so amazingly incorrect it's not even funny.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

 

[impervious182]

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm

We've discussed this fallacious report already, Kwayera. We've discussed how its models have proved to be incorrect and overly alarmist.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1863764/posts

Of course, none of us are able to properly deconstruct the report - not even you, because we aren't climatologists, so don't believe me... believe those who contributed to it and only with the threat of legal battle, got their names taken off, because they didn't agree with the findings of the report. E.g. Richard Lindzen.

 

[impervious182]

That's so amazingly incorrect it's not even funny.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

No you're incorrect.

Read the link provided earlier, or have a look at data from the Hadley Center. The world has not warmed since 1998 - that is a fact.

 

[Kwayera]

I agree with the climatologists who still have their name on the report (the majority).

Or do you take the stance of ignoring science for rhetoric, like creationists do regarding evolution?

Its models were incorrect. They were underestimated, and if you can't get it into your head why that doesn't detract from its legitimacy, then I really don't have the time to bash it in there.


And by the way, in the contexts of your posts, it's you're, and its. Use them correctly (or don't you speak English?).

 

[Kwayera]

No you're incorrect.

Read the link provided earlier, or have a look at data from the Hadley Center. The world has not warmed since 1998 - that is a fact.

Yes it has. Or did you just look at the pretty pictures and go "omg falsified graphs"?

 

[Trefoil]

I agree with the climatologists who still have their name on the report (the majority).

Or do you take the stance of ignoring science for rhetoric, like creationists do regarding evolution?

Its models were incorrect. They were underestimated, and if you can't get it into your head why that doesn't detract from its legitimacy, then I really don't have the time to bash it in there.


And by the way, in the contexts of your posts, it's you're, and its. Use them correctly (or don't you speak English?).

Alexbores believes that if he makes up a lie and repeats it enough times, it becomes reality.

Kind of like Rush Limbaugh.

 

[Trefoil]

Alexbores believes that if he makes up a lie and repeats it enough times, it becomes reality.

Kind of like Rush Limbaugh.

Did you know that the following graph is was altered by the Zionist Jews who invented global warming so Communism could take over?

It's quite ingenious, actually. What they did was go to all the ground stations and weather satellites and thermometers around the word and alter their readouts through Jewish mind control.

 

[impervious182]

Yes it has. Or did you just look at the pretty pictures and go "omg falsified graphs"?

The graphs showed 11-year averages. Or don't you know what an average is Kwayera?

If we go on the mean temperature graph, per-year, which the aforementioned link provides - you would see that since 1998 the temperature has not risen, but rather decreased.

Yeah, that's right.

Q.E. bloody D.

 

[impervious182]

Did you know that the following graph is was altered by the Zionist Jews who invented global warming so Communism could take over?

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2008/12/05/06.13.08.globalairtemp.gif

It's quite ingenious, actually. What they did was go to all the ground stations and weather satellites and thermometers around the word and alter their readouts through Jewish mind control.

Remind me; why are you still here?

 

[Kwayera]

The graphs showed 11-year averages. Or don't you know what an average is Kwayera?

If we go on the mean temperature graph, per-year, which the aforementioned link provides - you would see that since 1998 the temperature has not risen, but rather decreased.

Yeah, that's right.

Q.E. bloody D.

Haha. Don't you know that average = mean? http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/fawcett_linear.gif looks like a year-by-year mean to me.

 

[moll.]

In related statistics, boat-by shootings have risen 342% since the beginning of the millennium, whilst the chance of having to give directions using the line "and then turn left/right by the huge melting glacier" has risen ten-fold.

 

[impervious182]

Haha. Don't you know that average = mean?

You're a bit idiotic sometimes.

You used an 11 year average. I used a 1 year average.

 

[impervious182]

In related statistics, boat-by shootings have risen 342% since the beginning of the millennium, whilst the chance of having to give directions using the line "and then turn left/right by the huge melting glacier" has risen ten-fold.

Trefoil will in a moment, tell you how rising boat-by shootings are actually related to global warming.

Can't wait to hear this one.

 

[moll.]

Trefoil will in a moment, tell you how rising boat-by shootings are actually related to global warming.

Can't wait to hear this one.

That was the point, Slowpoke.

 

[Trefoil]

So let's summarise alexbores' stance: we're meant to believe that the current rapid and sustained change in global temperature is just a result of 'natural cycles' (which normally occur over tens of thousands of years, not 100 years) and that the industrial revolution didn't happen (please pay no attention to the astonishing elevation of CO2 ppm in the atmosphere!).

Furthermore, all graphs like this one are clearly incorrect because they were created by scientists, rather than an independent and objective body like the ExxonMobil funded American Enterprise Institute.

 

[impervious182]

That was the point, Slowpoke.

aww... but I wanted to take a pot-shot at Trefoil at the same time.

 

[Kwayera]

You're a bit idiotic sometimes.

You used an 11 year average. I used a 1 year average.

Look really carefully at that graph. Yes, that thing at the bottom? It's called a scale bar.

 

[moll.]

aww... but I wanted to take a pot-shot at Trefoil at the same time.

... And this is why everyone on BoS gangs up against you, no matter whether you're right or not.