davo_
good kid
In a close game it can be a referee's decision that loses a game for a team...Edge_Head said:- Its not the refs fault if you lose, its the teams fault.
In a close game it can be a referee's decision that loses a game for a team...Edge_Head said:- Its not the refs fault if you lose, its the teams fault.
The ref cant see everything and anything, in fact no one can.davo_ said:In a close game it can be a referee's decision that loses a game for a team...
I didn't say they could... don't back up your argument with meaningless bullshit. And it's not just that that makes a bad ref anyway. But anyway, that still doesn't change the fact that a ref's decision can swing a match.Edge_Head said:The ref cant see everything and anything, in fact no one can.
If a ref makes a decision against a team you should be able 2 counter it if ur such a good team, and it shouldnt really affect you.davo_ said:I didn't say they could... don't back up your argument with meaningless bullshit. And it's not just that that makes a bad ref anyway. But anyway, that still doesn't change the fact that a ref's decision can swing a match.
I'm pretty similar:ledzeppelin said:1. Sydney Roosters
2. Mosman, NSW
3. Used to follow the Bears. Roosters were my 'second team'. When the Bears moved/merged/whatever, needed a new team to support, so I picked the Roosters.
Ever think that some teams are really evenly matched? I didn't think so... A good team may be able to counter a bad decision against them - but that's hardly the point.Edge_Head said:If a ref makes a decision against a team you should be able 2 counter it if ur such a good team, and it shouldnt really affect you.