• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Help with particle accelerator dot pt plz (1 Viewer)

jetfan

Half Back Flanker
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
41
Location
The shire - love it or leave it...
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
identify the ways by which physicists continue to develop their understanding of matter using accelerators as a probe to investigate the structure of matter

Thanks in advance guys, I've only read stuff about how they are given kinetic energy and fired at target, is this meant to simulate certain chemical reactions like nucleus bombarding. Anything would be great, thanks
 

serge

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
635
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
its not really a chemical reaction at this point
here the chemists give up and make the physicists
do the hard work...

The only point you havent covered might be the fact
that when you collide high energy particles you can
probe 'deeper' into matter by observing the more and
more fundamental particles react with one another

this info becomes the link to the cosmologist dotpoint
that asks about how and why high-energy particle physics
is related to cosmology...
 

batigol

Giant
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
37
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
do we need to list the types of particle accelerators and the ways they accelerate particles to hit the target? also in nuclear fission it was mentioned that slow neutrons have better chances of getting absorbed by the nucleus, thereby starting a chain reaction. this is different from what happens in particles accelerators, where particles are given large kinetic energy, right?
 

serge

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
635
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
batigol said:
do we need to list the types of particle accelerators and the ways they accelerate particles to hit the target? ?
Its not its OWN dotpoint but it could be of some general help

batigol said:
also in nuclear fission it was mentioned that slow neutrons have better chances of getting absorbed by the nucleus, thereby starting a chain reaction. this is different from what happens in particles accelerators, where particles are given large kinetic energy, right?
it is different, you're right, because they're trying to achieve different goals
in a particle accelerator I dont think you want particles being absorbed,
personally ive been taught accelerators are all about mapping collisions
and using higher and higher energies you can look at smaller and smaller
particles / forces
 
Last edited:

gordo

Resident Jew
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
2,352
Location
bondi, sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
that was our hsc question last year so they won't ask it again
I hadn't really learned much about that dot point so i started talking about CERN from dan brown's Angels and Demons and the collision of high speed particles
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top