Higher Level Integration Marathon & Questions (1 Viewer)

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon

Extra question:

 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon

Beat me to it by nine hours :( But my solution involved factorising out the 1/4 so basel's could be seen easily. But my main problem is that I can't get rid of the negative that appears in the series expansion for log(1-x). Here's my solution, which ignores the sign error...



WHERE DID THE MISSING SIGN GO?!?!?!
 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon

Beat me to it by nine hours :( But my solution involved factorising out the 1/4 so basel's could be seen easily. But my main problem is that I can't get rid of the negative that appears in the series expansion for log(1-x). Here's my solution, which ignores the sign error...



WHERE DID THE MISSING SIGN GO?!?!?!
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon

Minkowski Inequality easily destroys the odd valued cases, but is itself destroyed by the even valued cases.

I hope that's what you meant by inequality, because olympiad inequalities don't look any more viable than brute force.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,657
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon

When we do Cauchy's Integrals what are we supposed to picture in our heads?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: Extracurricular Integration Marathon



This integral is clearly a prime target for contour integration. (We could factorise into its real quadratic factors, use partial fractions, and integrate the simpler summands, but contour integration seems faster).

Note that since the quartic denominator is both even and real, the poles of the integrand occur at where is an arbitrarily chosen root, say the one in the first quadrant of the the complex plane.

Now if we take a semicircular contour (radius R) with diameter on the real axis centred at the origin, and semicircular arc in the upper half-plane, then the integral around this contour (with positive orientation) is just equal to I, because the integrand decays as 1/R^2, and so the contribution from the curved segment of length O(R) tends to zero.

On the other hand, for sufficiently large R this integral is just equal to



It remains to compute , which is just the principal square root of .

Writing , we get

The resulting biquadratic yields , where is the golden ratio.

Hence

 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top