MedVision ad

How to do this (2 Viewers)

C

coca cola

Guest
@, $, % are the roots of the equation x^3 - bx^2 + cx - d = 0, find an expression in terms of b, c, d for:

(@$)^3 + (@%)^3 + (%$)^3

I don't understand Geha's solution in his 50 tips.

He's solutions goes like this:

i.e. (@$)^3 = b(@$)^2 - c(@$) + d... etc the usual steps after that.

But how could you substitute a product of 2 roots into the equation? How could you assume the products of the 2 roots is also a root to the original equation?

Its on Pg 112 if you have the book.
 
C

coca cola

Guest
And this, how does:

-cos(5pi/7) + cos(4pi/7) + cos(6pi/7) = -sin(2pi/7) + sin(3pi/7) + sin(pi/7)

Pg 152 of Phoenix By Topic, solution to Polynomial number 4, iv).
 

Estel

Tutor
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
1,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
On inspection, I think I may have made a mistake :p
 

ben_ratus

New Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
18
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
coca cola said:
-cos(5pi/7) + cos(4pi/7) + cos(6pi/7) = -sin(2pi/7) + sin(3pi/7) + sin(pi/7)
Sin(x) = Cos (pi/2 - x)
he just did that
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
>> But how could you substitute a product of 2 roots into the equation? <<
No you could not.
 
C

coca cola

Guest
umm so there is something wrong with these solutions and its not just me, but how odd, how could Geha do a question completely wrong, its not like its a simple typo.
 

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
have you written down the complete Q (on BoS)?
including all the lead-ups and part you don't think are really relevant?
there might be some conditions for the roots which are given on previous parts...
 
C

coca cola

Guest
ben_ratus said:
Sin(x) = Cos (pi/2 - x)
he just did that
I don't think so, because if you did that you'll get a different solution. I thought it couldn't be wrong because the question states to show the result and the solution showed that result, but in a odd way.
 
C

coca cola

Guest
mojako said:
have you written down the complete Q (on BoS)?
including all the lead-ups and part you don't think are really relevant?
there might be some conditions for the roots which are given on previous parts...
Oh ok, the entire question is:

Tip 27 Example 2

@, $, % are the roots of the equation x^3 - bx^2 + cx - d = 0, find an expression in terms of b, c, d for:

i) @^2 + $^2 + %^2

ii) @^3 + $^3 + %^3

iii) (1 + @^3)(1 + $^3)(1 + %^3)

its just part iii), when you expand it you'll get something with this (@$)^3 + (@%)^3 + (%$)^3. And Geha states that the best way to solve this is to substitute the product of the 2 roots back into the equation, like what you do with if its a single root. Then he proceeds by doing it that way.
 

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
coca cola said:
And this, how does:

-cos(5pi/7) + cos(4pi/7) + cos(6pi/7) = -sin(2pi/7) + sin(3pi/7) + sin(pi/7)

Pg 152 of Phoenix By Topic, solution to Polynomial number 4, iv).
by calculator, this isn't correct.
 

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I personally don't think you can sub @$ etc.

Do it like ngai suggested somewhere down this thread.

The approaches I was thinking of are
1.
Find an equation whose roots are @$, @%, $%, call them y_1, y_2, y_3.
then from that equation you can find y_1^3 + y_2^3 + y_3^3

How do we find that equation?
Say we need to find an eqn with roots @^2 etc, and want to write that equation in y just to make things different.
we write "a (root y)^3 - b (root y)^2 + c (root y) - d = 0"
Formally we find root y by letting y = x^2 --> x = root y (or minus root y... you can also use that).

Now, to find an equation with roots @$, @%, $%, we need to find a common expression for them. @$ is "@$% / %", @% is "@$% / $" etc.
so each of them is "@$% divided by @, $, or %"
but we know @$% = d (product of roots of the original eqn)
so our new roots is d / @, d / $, d / %.
so we let y = d / x --> x = d / y
and continue from there.

(This is similar to ngai's but his looks simpler)

2.
Alternatively, find an eqn whose roots are 1 + @^3 etc.
If you can transform the new eqn into a cubic though (I don't think you can).
 
Last edited:

Logix

Member
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
177
i think putting it as @$%/% would work.
However, for the 2nd method that u stated, u need to get it back into the form ax^3+bx^2+cx+d, dont u? i dont think all subsitutions of x can get back into that form, especially if u sub x=cube root of (x-1)
 
C

coca cola

Guest
mojako said:
If you do this, can you tell me if the result turns out to be the same as Geha's solution?
In the book the solution is: (@$)^3 + (@%)^3 + (%$)^3 = b(c^2) -2(b^2)d - c^2 + d

Sorry but I don't quite understand your method.
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Is Geha's book anygood? Is it just worked solutions from past (how many years??) HSC papers grouped into topic by topic ? Inform me some1 thnx
 

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Logix said:
i think putting it as @$%/% would work.
However, for the 2nd method that u stated, u need to get it back into the form ax^3+bx^2+cx+d, dont u? i dont think all subsitutions of x can get back into that form, especially if u sub x=cube root of (x-1)
yea.. I dont think it works, hehe...
(cubic root)^3 + (cubic root)^2 + (cubic root) + constant cant easily be made to look like a cubic.
but something like (cubic root)^3 + (cubic root) + constant can.
 
Last edited:

ngai

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
223
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
coca cola said:
how could Geha do a question completely wrong, its not like its a simple typo.
nobody's perfect

if u want to see if his solution is wrong, then just create a cubic by expanding (x-1)(x-2)(x-3), which has roots 1,2,3, and see if u get contradiction
 

mojako

Active Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
1,333
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
ngai said:
nobody's perfect

if u want to see if his solution is wrong, then just create a cubic by expanding (x-1)(x-2)(x-3), which has roots 1,2,3, and see if u get contradiction
ok.. he's wrong.. but how do you do part (iii) in post #10?
can we do that kind of question?
 

Jase

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
724
Location
Behind You
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I don't see why you cant do it like the way its layed out.

if A is a root and B is a root. Then AB is also a solution. as in, AB divides into P(x). Hence any product of two roots works with P(x). So just do that,,

or you could expand it all and transmogrify everything until you end up with the correct forms. If you really want.
 

ngai

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
223
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
coca cola said:
@, $, % are the roots of the equation x^3 - bx^2 + cx - d = 0
iii) (1 + @^3)(1 + $^3)(1 + %^3)
expand, and i like to use a,b,c as the roots
and i'll rename the equation to be x^3 - px^2 + qx - r = 0
1 + a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + (ab)^3 + (bc)^3 + (ca)^3 + (abc)^3
and (ab)^3 = (abc)^3/c^3, (bc)^3 = ... etc
now, u know 1
u know a^3 + b^3 + c^3
u know (abc)^3
so all u needa know is (1/a^3) + (1/b^3) + (1/c^3)
x^3 - px^2 + qx - r = 0 has roots a,b,c
so rx^3 - qx^2 + px - 1 = 0 has roots 1/a, 1/b, 1/c (let y=1/x, so x = 1/y, etc etc)
and then u can get (1/a^3) + (1/b^3) + (1/c^3) using the same way u did part i and ii for the other eqn
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top