Is there anything you can do to get around this or compensate for the extra positive area you get?The insides being trigonometric has nothing to do with it, it is just that
.
Isn't this essentially the proof of Newton's method but working backwards?I was in 2-unit one day and discovered a new way to use Newton's method of approximation, to get an exact answer of something.
How ironic, using an approximation to get the exact answer.
This is only a 2-unit question, but by being limited to using Newton's method of Approximation, it becomes extension 1 work.
View attachment 28150
Given that the curve is y=x^2, find the equation of the tangent, given it touches y = x^2 at point A.
Hence, find the x-value of the intersection of the tangent with the curve, given that the tangent touches the x-axis at x=2, Using only Newton's approximation method (You must use it because I am a harsh marker)
I discovered this result on my own, hopefully you guys can too. Image made using Geogebra.
after checking the answer using 3 different methods, i can confirm it is indeed correct. well technically there are two answers if you take different cases, but sqrt (1+sin2x) +c is one of them at least if you change 1+sin2x into sin ^2 x +cos ^2 x + 2sinxcosx, it becomes sinx + cosx +c, which is the simplified answer.That isn't correct.
My mistakeafter checking the answer using 3 different methods, i can confirm it is indeed correct. well technically there are two answers if you take different cases, but sqrt (1+sin2x) +c is one of them at least if you change 1+sin2x into sin ^2 x +cos ^2 x + 2sinxcosx, it becomes sinx + cosx +c, which is the simplified answer.
Isn't this essentially the proof of Newton's method but working backwards?
i.e. we want to find
Isn't this essentially the proof of Newton's method but working backwards?
i.e. we want to find
Nope the absolute value needs to be there, and you did the right thing by splitting into 4 integrals (only 2 is needed though).
i dont need to put absolute because its not area yeh?
Sorry i wasnt specificNope the absolute value needs to be there, and you did the right thing by splitting into 4 integrals (only 2 is needed though).
Yep andSorry i wasnt specific
Pretend, I = Z
Split 4 times,
I = |A|+ |B| + |C| + |D|
I = A + B + |- C - D| (i was talking about these absolute values)
i can eliminate each absolute value from each (sinx) because of ASTC
For, 0 ≤x≤ pi/2, sinx >0 (A)
For, pi/2 ≤ x ≤ pi, sinx >0 (S)
For, pi ≤ x ≤ 3pi/2, sinx <0 (T)
For, 3pi/2 ≤ x ≤ 2pi, sinx <0 (C)
and i realised i shouldnt have splitted it into 4 lol
what abotu this?
this lolOr just draw a picture lol