MedVision ad

HSC 2016 MX1 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

I think there is an unfortunate ambiguity in the use of the word "corresponding" in this case. In this usage, corresponding refers to our day-to-day usage of the term; not the "corresponding" as in "alternate" and "co-interior" which all 3 are technical terms. So the use of "corresponding" in the given explanation leads to this confusion.
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Oh, reading what Drongoski said.

Proper reasoning is this

1. Therefore angle this = angle that (corresponding angles on congruent triangles)
2. Therefore || (pair of alternate angles equal)

Yeah thing with me is I always say "matching" angles in cong triangles cause I hate using the word corresponding (in geometry) outside of the context of parallelism
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Would my reason be good enough as well?
You'd need to give the reason as related to the congruent triangles part. If you said alternate angles as the reason for the equal angles, then that means you're assuming the lines are parallel, which is what we're trying to prove.
 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Show by mathematical induction that [(a+b)/2]^2 (less than or equal to, I don't know how to type it with my keyboard) (A^n+B^n)/2.

Question asked to prove that A^(n+1)-A^nB+B^(n+1)-B^nA=(a-b)^2(A^n-1+A^n-2+...+B^n-1) and deduce A^(n+1)+B^(n+1) (greater than or equal to) A^nB+B^nA, given that A>0, B>0 and n is a positive integer beforehand, which I did get, and I think I'm supposed to use them in the induction, but I'm not sure how...:p
Assuming a is A and b is B, could there possibly be a typo in the question?

Suppose a = 0.1, b = 0.2 and n = 3. Then





Therefore, statement is not true for all n.

Here are my guesses of possible typos from working on this question:



OR



EDIT: typo on denominator
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Drawing attention to this question, which was posted a few days ago and still has no replies. I checked the times, and this was posted shortly before another user posted a reply to a previous question so perhaps it was lost in the replies? But anyway, I'd really like this question answered thanks ^_^
Can you please retype what you're trying to prove using this? http://s1.daumcdn.net/editor/fp/service_nc/pencil/Pencil_chromestore.html

Copy and paste the entire syntax onto this forum.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

It should just be what HeroicPandas and I wrote above.
Alright if you're sure then...


...well I am missing the obvious again for the inductive step:





 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Here is a hint. Highlight to see. Also in LaTeX code to try to prevent immediate comprehension in-case you accidentally highlighted or ctrl+A
___
\frac{a^{k+1}+b^{k+1}}{2} \geq \frac{a^kb + b^ka}{2} = \boxed{?}\times \left( \frac{a^k + b^k}{2} \right ) + \boxed{?} \times \left(\frac{a^k + b^k}{2} \right ) - \boxed{?}
___
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Hint: Use the fact that (an - bn)(a-b) is non-negative for all real a and b.
Would not have thought about that at all. Just by substituting this result into line 3 of the proof the result falls out immediately.



I was trying to think about why akb+abk≤ak+1+bk+1. Guess I've never seen that before to use it.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Would not have thought about that at all. Just by substituting this result into line 3 of the proof the result falls out immediately.



I was trying to think about why akb+abk≤ak+1+bk+1. Guess I've never seen that before to use it.
Well if you can't prove inequality as it holds, subtracting is always good for HSC questions, because usually it is possible to factorise and partition the expression into strictly positive terms.
 

davidgoes4wce

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
1,877
Location
Sydney, New South Wales
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

Find the equation of the parabola whose axis is parallel to the y-axis, vertex is (2,-1) and has a tangent with equation y=2x-7.


I have no answer to compare against . This question (can't remember off the top of my head) but was used in the Trials at one of the schools in NSW.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 3U Marathon

The parabola takes the form (x-2)^2=4a(y+1)

A wolfram alpha approach: Sub y=2x-7 in and simplify the expression

Take the quadratic discriminant, set it equal to 0 and take your value for a
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top