slzybanana said:
wasting a bit of my time on this course isn't really my problem. it's the part where BoS considers me an unintelligent piece of sh!t.
The signs are all there.
slzybanana said:
What? Plagiarism in tetiary education? Yeah right. I'm soooooo gonna go and plagiarise when the universities have a program/machine that scans massive portions of the internet.
Well, as I said, it certainly wouldn't be a precedent.
slzybanana said:
The fact that they take us as morons is what ticks me off. They're willing to suspend someone's HSC if he/she doesn't complete a course so idiotically simplistic, that an 8 year old with the right set of vocab could do. We're being fed crap we already know except on an even simpler level.
Throughout your academic career you will be made to jump through arbitrary hoops with little to no *actual* benefit, aside from being able to tick off the box. That's just the way these things go, and it's not even particularly unique to education.
slzybanana said:
Just because a lot of people often choose not to obey the rules of good scholarship it means we don't know the rules?
Like I said, I have experienced people who genuinely *don't* know the rules. Apparently you're not that brand of moron, but I think it's pretty clear that this is a measure implemented so they can say "told you so" when the dumb shits get busted, and isn't intended as an attack upon your massive intellect.
slzybanana said:
We aren't primary schoolers who can't differentiate right from wrong, it's just some choose to do right and others choose wrong. Yet here we are, being spoonfed at such a low level that it's degrading and humiliating.
This one actually made me laugh. When are you not spoonfed in high school exactly? Maybe if you concentrate less on being offended and the Board's audacity and more on being aware that sitting your HSC doesn't put you up there with the Mensa crew, well, you might not get so bent out of shape over something this trivial.