MedVision ad

Incredibly Hard Integration..or not... (2 Viewers)

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
This integration has been at me for weeks, and I still have NO IDEA how to approach it, help would be appreciated please.


∫ln (ln x).dx
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
ln(lnx)=1.ln(ln(x))
Integral ln(lnx)
=xln(lnx) - integral 1/ln(x)

Hmm.

integral x(ln(lnx))/x dx
u=ln(x)
du=1/x
integral e^u.lnu du
=e^u.lnu - integral (e^u)/u du
=lnx.ln(lnx) - integral x/lnx dx

Hmm.
 
Last edited:

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
it doesn't work does it Slide Rule? and for the (ln^2 x^2)/2 answer, i don't think that works.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Where did you get it from? If it wasn't a past paper or 4u textbook, then you do realise it probably requires all sorts of fancy stuff, such as PolyLogs?
 

nit

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Messages
833
Location
let's find out.
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
where did you come across this question?

Edit: Slide, you pre-empted me there.
 
Last edited:

Will Hunting

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
214
Location
Carlton
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Use the substitution, ln x = y, x = ey, dx = eydy

Now,

∫ln(ln x)dx = ∫ey(ln y)dy

IBP, where,

u = ln y, u' = 1/y
v' = ey, v = ey

I = ey(ln y) - ∫eydy/y

Again,

∫eydy/y = ∫eydy/ln ey = ey/y + ∫eydy/y2

*Yawwwwn*... I'm sleepy. Soz about the incompleteness. I'll give it another bash tomoz.
 
Last edited:

ngai

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
223
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
lucifel said:
This integration has been at me for weeks, and I still have NO IDEA how to approach it, help would be appreciated please.


∫ln (ln x).dx
maple says its ln(ln(x))*x+Ei(1,-ln(x))
whatever Ei is....
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
ngai said:
maple says its ln(ln(x))*x+Ei(1,-ln(x))
whatever Ei is....
yea, this isn't a 4u integration so it should be in the beauty and elegance section..
 

martin

Mathemagician
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Messages
75
Location
Brisbane
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
The integrator http://integrals.wolfram.com/ (which uses mathematica) gives

integral(Log[Log[x]]) = xLog[Log[x] - LogIntegral[x]

A bit of research shows that LogIntegral[x] = integral from 0 to x of dt/logt. So it seems that it isn't possible to do in terms of elementary functions. This is true of most random integrals that you choose.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
^ Indeed. That's the basic result you get when you use integration by parts once.

ln(ln(x))=1.ln(ln(x))
u=ln(ln(x)), v=x
u'=1/(xln(x)), v'=1
Integral ln(ln(x)) = uv'
=uv - integral u'v
=xln(ln(x)) - integral 1/ln(x)
 

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
No I didnt' think it was a 4U integration, oh well, i just saw an easier one where the there was an extra 'x' in the denominator, so i thought what would happen if i took that out, obviously made the integration that much more difficult.

Oh well, still a solution would be appreciated, even though I may not understand it.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
You don't understand; there probably isn't a solution.

If there is, it's beyond the capability of even Mathematica.
 

m_isk

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
158
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
substituting u=lnx, you get integrate e^u lnu...can this be integrated? :rofl: (i'm thinking parts)
 

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
i severly doubt there is no solution per se, there could be one, just way beyond the scope of 4U, it doesn't mean there is no solution to it.
 

m_isk

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
158
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
lucifel said:
i severly doubt there is no solution per se, there could be one, just way beyond the scope of 4U, it doesn't mean there is no solution to it.
why?? it could be IMPOSSIBLE...eg solve lnx=0 No solution!! :D
 

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
thats undefined more than no solution, integrations can't be 'undefined' as such.
 

m_isk

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
158
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
hhmmmm..good point, but still, if i siad solve for x: lnx=0, there is no solution why???because ln0 is undefined..anyway this is irrelevant does anybody out there have a solution!?!?!?!
 

SeDaTeD

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
571
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The solution has already been given, just read up a few posts. However the solution cannot be understood with elementary calculus.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top