alussovsky
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2018
- Messages
- 39
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2019
So I came across this induction question and am quite stuck mid-way.
The question is: Prove that
is divisible by
for all odd integers ![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white n )
So far, I have this working out done:
1. To prove:
, where ![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white M \in \mathbb{Z} )
Prove true for![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white n=1 )
![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white LHS = 2^1 + 1 )
which is divisible by 3
So the statement is true for![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white n=1 )
2. Assume true for
, where ![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white k \in \mathbb{Z} )
i.e.
, where ![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white N \in \mathbb{Z} )
3. Prove true for![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white n=k+1 )
To prove:
, where ![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white P \in \mathbb{Z} )
![](https://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\bg_white LHS = 2^{k+1} + 1 )
Aaaand I'm stuck at that step. I've no idea how to manipulate the LHS so that the assumption from 2 can be subbed into 3. Also, is the working so far correct? Thanks!
The question is: Prove that
So far, I have this working out done:
1. To prove:
Prove true for
So the statement is true for
2. Assume true for
i.e.
3. Prove true for
To prove:
Aaaand I'm stuck at that step. I've no idea how to manipulate the LHS so that the assumption from 2 can be subbed into 3. Also, is the working so far correct? Thanks!