Is it wrong? (1 Viewer)

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
1time4theppl:

I labelled political economy as a marxist course because Rick Kuhn (the head of the Socialist Alternative at the ANU) took B. Ecc at USYD majoring in politocal economy. And because the content of political economy is studied under Poltics at the ANU in subjects run by Rick like Money Power War, courses which are all well known for their marxism. If anything you reinforce my assumption by stating that it uses marxism as a critique of other systems. And keynsian economics arn't in macro?

Yes first year micro+macro makes many assumptions and holds all bar one variable constant. As you progress through an economics major (eg MM every year) less and less is held constant, less and less assumptions are made.

A report on employment by your uni is by definition biased and may not be representative of broader trends.

I stated that Comm Liberal Studies was a watering down IF the minimum number of commerce/eco units required was LESS than the minimum for a straight Comm degree. You have yet to clarify this.

I have not impugned your mental capabilities, you however do. Your feeble arts mind has failed at basic comprehention. I said that it seemed that you struggled in maths courses. I BASED this on, you not tutoring (eg in the list of cheap tutoring, you do not tutor any maths) and your SEEMING favouring of arts over maths. This became relevant because you seemed to strongly advocate arts over maths and because your transfering tied in nicely with the articles underlying theme of do what you want at uni don't think about a career.

I assumed that econometrics was not required for marketing as it is typically only required of students doing a B. Ecc. or Actuarial studies. Being required as part of or a complement to an economics major or as a lead in subject in actuarial studies. Hence my assumption was perfectly valid, no where else have I heard of econometrics in marketing.

You suggest that economics is not an incredibly broad degree, it is. Micro+macro are very broad topic areas providing those who study them with powerful analytical tools. The whole idea of an economics degree is to do three things: provide analytical tools (and the reasons they work), create a broad knowledge of the economy AND its role in society and finally to provide avenue for specialisation. Those who do 'straight' economics typically take a major from outside the faculty to further complement economics and broaden their knowledge. Eco/Comm is probably the second most flexible and broadest degree you can study (after BA).
 

stazi

Nightman
Joined
Feb 23, 2003
Messages
14,093
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
addymac said:
1)If anything you reinforce my assumption by stating that it uses marxism as a critique of other systems.
2)And keynsian economics arn't in macro?
3) A report on employment by your uni is by definition biased and may not be representative of broader trends.
4) I stated that Comm Liberal Studies was a watering down IF the minimum number of commerce/eco units required was LESS than the minimum for a straight Comm degree. You have yet to clarify this.
5)I said that it seemed that you struggled in maths courses. I BASED this on, you not tutoring (eg in the list of cheap tutoring, you do not tutor any maths) and your SEEMING favouring of arts over maths. This became relevant because you seemed to strongly advocate arts over maths and because your transfering tied in nicely with the articles underlying theme of do what you want at uni don't think about a career.
1)Marxism IS a valid critique for capitalism. We didn't get the fact that 'capitalism=bad. be a socialist/communist' reinforced at all. We simply identified the problems withing capitalism which are very relevant.
Just like Institutional economics does exactly the same thing. Even writers of neoclassical economics, arguably still the orthodoxy, identified problems.
2) Keynesian economics is in many economic textbooks (from what i heard) for macroeconomics. The circular flow of income (the leakages/injections) model is commonly taught apparently as are fiscal/monetary policies.
3) Ummm...ok. A quantitative research based on graduates is bias? This particular mode of research used the destinations of graduates 6 months after they complete their final year.
The comparisson:
B Commerce:
Starting median full time salary: $38,500
% Graduates full time employment: 52.11%
B Commerce (Liberal Studies): $40,000, 78.26%
B Eco Soc Scie: $37,500, 35.71%
B eco: $38,000, 58.93%
B Com/Combined: $40,000 (sorry i thought it was lower than com lib but it's the same. however the employment figures are low), 59.61%
4) B Commerce: At least 100 credit points from the Faculty of Economics and Business.
B Com (liberal studies): At least 132 credit points from the Faculty of Economics and Business.
Ohhh big watering down. You have to do over a semester's worth of units for com lib.
5) I am not tutoring maths because (gasp!!!!!) I did not do maths.
 

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
2. as far as I know keynsian economics is virtually the basis of macro-economics.
3. The bias comes in that the figures deal only with USYD and thus may be unrepresentative of broader trends due to localised issues.
4. I said it could constitute a watering down, I based this on the knowledge that combined degrees generally are. Evidently this is not the case for Comm Lib Studies, thank you for clarifying.
5. Yes indeed you are not tutoring maths because you did not do it, presumably because of an aversion to it/difficulty with it....
5.
 

stazi

Nightman
Joined
Feb 23, 2003
Messages
14,093
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
addymac said:
3. The bias comes in that the figures deal only with USYD and thus may be unrepresentative of broader trends due to localised issues.
5. Yes indeed you are not tutoring maths because you did not do it, presumably because of an aversion to it/difficulty with it....
3) It doesn't seem like this is a document that's for mass release: rather more for current students. In fact, it's even listed under the information for current students category. Also, there are many degrees with terrible starting pay and employment rates: one would assume those would not be published (I'm thinking college of fine arts degree, which they could easily have given a miss, as its not even on the main campus). I actually feel sorry for people doing that course. From memory, 25% employment rate, with the bulk of those employed in finance/business/food service and only about 12% actually doing art related stuff.
5) Yes, I did have an aversion/difficulty with it. I had always been a much better writer than mathmatician and only planned to do 10 units for the hsc. I much preferred doing subjects that I would enjoy and not be bored out of my mind doing. My mind does not work well with numbers.
 
S

Shuter

Guest
1Time4thePpl said:
5) Yes, I did have an aversion/difficulty with it. I had always been a much better writer than mathmatician and only planned to do 10 units for the hsc. I much preferred doing subjects that I would enjoy and not be bored out of my mind doing. My mind does not work well with numbers.
Why the hell did you pick a degree with economics in it.
 

Enlightened_One

King of Bullshit
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Messages
1,105
Location
around about here - still
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Mate if you like pysch then definetly do it. 103 is usually a lot of research in a specific are so it should be interesting. And it will look good on your resume. And it maybe of help in pysch in later years
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top