breaking
paint huffing moron
thanks 
-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Latham or Howard? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter freaking_out
- Start date
people get so very worked up about politics
personally i'm pro labour but that's just me
and no i dont have any justification for it, but i think it's because they're more flexible towards change and equality than the libs
personally i'm pro labour but that's just me
and no i dont have any justification for it, but i think it's because they're more flexible towards change and equality than the libs
Skillo
is in a theatre near you
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2003
- Messages
- 947
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2004
Oh please. I am one of those bloody feminists and I'll burn my bra in front of your face anyday.morgang said:
gem_max
Member
Yep Howard here too. Just look at how strong the Aussie dollar is and you have a reason and well deserved result for all that so called 'arse licking'.
Latham supporting students are too easily manipulated by his claims about lowering educational costs. At the end of the day we must all remember that education is a state department, therefore under the control of BOB CARR who is of course LABOR. Labor also holds the same political stance as the once HATED Paul Keating held, a man who was of course LABOR. We had a hard enough time of getting rid of him as you all should know. Do we really want that to happen again? Also (this will cause a stir I know and am sorry) LABOR were the party in power back when the whole Stolen Generation attempt at genocide occured. So who's the real baddy eh?
Thankgosh I'm old enough to vote. Labor had a hard enough time finding someone that could run their own party. How will they go at running a whole damn country...
Latham supporting students are too easily manipulated by his claims about lowering educational costs. At the end of the day we must all remember that education is a state department, therefore under the control of BOB CARR who is of course LABOR. Labor also holds the same political stance as the once HATED Paul Keating held, a man who was of course LABOR. We had a hard enough time of getting rid of him as you all should know. Do we really want that to happen again? Also (this will cause a stir I know and am sorry) LABOR were the party in power back when the whole Stolen Generation attempt at genocide occured. So who's the real baddy eh?
Thankgosh I'm old enough to vote. Labor had a hard enough time finding someone that could run their own party. How will they go at running a whole damn country...
breaking
paint huffing moron
erm yeah... but nearly everyone who has voted on this poll are between teh ages of, say, 16 and 20. hardly a realistic outcome.
gem_max
Member
1)actually its about the same yet for a while there it had dropped so low that the rural community (where i originate from) were suffering tremendously and therefore those from a similar persuasion, particularly farmers, will sway towards howard for bringing it back up again. A weak dollar increases exports which in turn increases the dollar value. Its a cycle which needs someone experienced to control. Labor in the past have not being able to maintain the balance, hence the tirade about KEATING.Asquithian said:
2)Yes i realise the federal treasury operates in conjunction with the state to allocate educational costs yet i said 'at the end of the day'. What I was focusing on is that if Latham takes power he wont be giving too much attention to something his government only has a fraction of control over, therefore he shouldnt be making such claims.
3)Read the 'perspectives' section of the report. Concentrate on the words of Kim Beazley.
Finally i was merely exerting my right to have my own opinion. I did not abuse this right by attacking a previous member's post and have only chosen to quote now to maintain my own opinion with no disrespect to those who may not share the same view. Show some courtesy and consideration before quoting SIR under the givan circumstances.
gem_max
Member
2)media manipulation