Legal Studies Predictions/Thoughts (1 Viewer)

[technologias]

I don't think so, I think the UDHR only covers right to peaceful assembly in regards to like "peace" related stuff from my memory

that is the peace in the udhr

 

[thicckoolkid]

that is the peace in the udhr

Eh lowkey I don't think they'd care too much as long as you have more than 2 examples and exaplain why the rights developed

 

[civiclens]

Also what did you guys say for peace rights? I only included the UDHR, ICCPR and Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace (1984) with like how war and stufff prompted it, I feel like I didn't do it right. Also please tell me that there are no domestic legislaiton for peace because i said that

UN Charter, the Declaration, then I spoke how it arose after WW2, and then nuclear age

 

[technologias]

Eh lowkey I don't think they'd care too much as long as you have more than 2 examples and exaplain why the rights developed

The UDHR was where the right was first developed in response to the deaths in WW1 and 2 then iccpr put them in the covenant so either would work

 

[bas216]

also for Q1 does anyone remember the Q? it was somehting about the burden/standard of proof.

im 90% sure i said burden but cant really remember

 

[thicckoolkid]

The UDHR was where the right was first developed in response to the deaths in WW1 and 2 then iccpr put them in the covenant so either would work

Yeah and the declaration of the peoples right to peace also works

 

[thicckoolkid]

also for Q1 does anyone remember the Q? it was somehting about the burden/standard of proof.

im 90% sure i said burden but cant really remember

I think it was like: "what is the job of the prosecution in proving guilt?" or something adjacent

 

[bas216]

I think it was like: "what is the job of the prosecution in proving guilt?" or something adjacent

oh yeah so burden i was just overthinking then

 

[thicckoolkid]

oh yeah so burden i was just overthinking then

also what was the facetime one, I think I chose A, but I really don't know if I read the person's name wrong now

 

[technologias]

also what was the facetime one, I think I chose A, but I really don't know if I read the person's name wrong now

it was b since chris was the principal in the second degree (or whatever answer had him in second degree)

 

[hey2737]

it seems that the right to peace is implied by the ICCPR so i dont think markers will be too strict on that

So was there a point in memorising any quotes then?

 

[thicckoolkid]

So was there a point in memorising any quotes then?

I never memorised quotes for any of the international bill of rights conventions/declarations

 

[bas216]

also the forfeiture of assets question was confusing i said it has little deterrence anyone else say the same

 

[technologias]

yeah i thought that the getaway driver was 2nd degree bc he was present but that wasnt even an option so i said B

getaway driver was accesory after the fact so you got lucky lol

 

[technologias]

also the forfeiture of assets question was confusing i said it has little deterrence anyone else say the same

that option made the most sense imo

 

[bas216]

that option made the most sense imo

yeah and the only one that related to the Q too

 

[bas216]

i dont think the multis were hard, its just some Qs were so weird

 

[bas216]

getaway driver was accesory after the fact so you got lucky lol

this has always confused me bc in my trials i said getaway driver was after the fact and got that Q wrong

my trials q was "Ben drives the getaway in an armed robbery, what role did he play?" and the answer was principle in the 2nd degree

 

[aerithgainsborough]

if anyone has multis with answers can you please tag me

 

[civiclens]

this has always confused me bc in my trials i said getaway driver was after the fact and got that Q wrong

my trials q was "Ben drives the getaway in an armed robbery, what role did he play?" and the answer was principle in the 2nd degree

that is such an ambiguous question. i would have argued for that.