MedVision ad

Mining tax: Henry v Rudd (1 Viewer)

murphyad

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
416
Location
Newy, brah!
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I have a question for you economic-minded folk on this board.

The Henry Tax review advocated a 40% 'resource rent tax' and a reduction in the company tax rate to 25%. Mr Rudd took this and turned it into a 'super profits tax' on mining companies with a corresponding drop in the company tax rate to 28%.

My question is this:

What (if any) is the difference between a 'resource rent tax' and the mining tax that Rudd has proposed?

This might be dumb but I know shit about economics and that's why I'm curious.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I believe a super profits tax only kicks in for those companies making very high profits, while a resource rent tax is ubiquitous, but I'm not 100% sure.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top