heycarmen s said:Shit shit shit... i read "Shakespeares chracterisation of King Lear" as meaning charcters in the play, so i did Gloucester and Edmund and didn't even mention Lear, then when we were talking bout it afterwards realised King Lear wasn't in italics and they wer ein fact talking abotut he charcter. shit shit shit!
i was like you too, didn't realise KL question meant characterisation of the guy and did one of the readings on goneril and regan for one scene and just luckily did Lear for the other three quarters
but maybe you can get away with it coz of your thesis?
like mine was characterisation of lear opened my interpretation to a small extent as it was the way in which characters can be interpreted differently in different context which had the bigger extent.
so im hoping my part on the sisters still fits in my thesis
i bet lots of people are in our shoes