Notation question (1 Viewer)

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
WolframAlpha uses it, but I never see it anywhere else. So is this technically incorrect notation?

 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
WolframAlpha uses it, but I never see it anywhere else. So is this technically incorrect notation?

No, it is the international standard for raising logarithmic functions to arbitrary powers. Most number theory papers, that I've seen, that have exponentiated logarithms, use it.

Iterated Logarithms are a different matter entirely.
 

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
It depends on the context you're working in. Sometimes it's useful for , other times for . Neither is more correct than the other. Additionally, usually represents the inverse function, rather than the reciprocal of the function. usually represents the nth derivative when n is positive, and the nth primitive when n is negative, and the function itself when n is 0.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
No, it is the international standard for raising logarithmic functions to arbitrary powers. Most number theory papers, that I've seen, that have exponentiated logarithms, use it.

Iterated Logarithms are a different matter entirely.
Have no clue why I've never come across this anymore.

And yes, that I am aware of. That's the same with saying sin(sin(x))

It depends on the context you're working in. Sometimes it's useful for , other times for . Neither is more correct than the other. Additionally, usually represents the inverse function, rather than the reciprocal of the function. usually represents the nth derivative when n is positive, and the nth primitive when n is negative, and the function itself when n is 0.
Pretty sure the function of a function notation was something along the lines of f bullet f(x).

Yes, f^-1(x) I'm aware of of course and f^'bracketed-index'(x) is an nth derivative

But even then inverse sine can be written using the arcsin(x) notation
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
In Linear Algebra, matrix multiplication is equivalent to function composition.

If a matrix M represents a function f, then M^2 represents f^2, but M^2 is a multiplication and f^2 is a composition.

The composition power notation is regular used in Linear Algebra, but only on generic function f, not on specific functions such as log.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top