Official UAI Thread: Post your UAI's here (2 Viewers)

[yvonne_710]

It will make no difference.

okay .........i see...........does anyone 2004 USYD economics cut-off for international students? can someone tell me??

 

[Plebeian]

According to the UAC Guide (pg 336), the projected cut-off for 2005 is 86.50. Of course, this is only an estimate. BTW none of this should really be in this thread but you have private messaging turned off.

 

[llamalope]

96.55...dun ask me how tho....my marks weren't that high!!!!!! champagne all round!

 

[ToO LaZy ^*]

SAM gave me 95.95, uac have me 94.50...damn bastards
at least i got into my 3rd preference. (hopefully)
BEc@UNSW here i comE!

 

[inasero]

looking around..i must say there are some very high acheivers this year. Congratulations, you've made us all proud. I just hope everyone will get the UAI they require to enter their desired course. Let's keep our fingers crossed until then!

 

[Korn]

People who got band 6

Does everyone who got band 6 get put in the newspaper, cause i got band 6 in Senior Science

 

[inasero]

yes you do...plus there's an extra section for extra special people who get over 90 in 10 or more units (english not necessarily included). Will I be seeing your name?

 

[ptitsa]

99.55!!


omg...i cant believe it! i'm so happy

 

[llamalope]

lets hope that the uai's required for courses dont go up cuz we did so well.....I say, good on SAM, it was only off by 0.35

 

[BillyMak]

I haven't talked to everyone, but as far as I know dux was Dan Wills, and he got 98.45 from memory. His predicted UAI from SAM yesterday was 99.1, so we all expected him to get dux.

By the looks of the distinguished achievers list no one will beat that, the next highest was about 97.5 I think.

 

[laracroft]

yay! i was sooo surprised with my UAI i nearly fell off my chair.... 95.90

 

[Cyph]

2 Chemistry 72/100 75/100 74 4
2 English (Advanced) 92/100 88/100 90 6
1 English Extension 1 44/50 47/50 46 E4
1 English Extension 2 43/50 46/50 45 E4
2 Mathematics 92/100 92/100 92 6
1 Mathematics Extension 1 36/50 38/50 37 E3
2 German Continuers 92/100 93/100 93 6
1 German Extension 40/50 43/50 42 E3

NSW UAI: 96.70

hmm, using UAISeeker, I came up with 94-95.xx, but I was conservative so I didn't dissapoint my sister.

 

[Fledz]

Man I'm screwed, 71.35, I can't get into ANYTHING!

Is there any way to do something at TAFE for a year to get into science at uni? Any help would be appreciated right now since I need to start thinking about what I'm going to do.

Maths killed me. I'm at that point now where I really want to go back in time and repeat everything, because in all honesty I could have done MUCH better, if only I had put the effort in. Could have possibly even got in the 90s but it's too late now.

So....any chance of any science subjects dropping about 10 points in the cut-offs?

 

[cameron0110]

Units Courses Entered Examination Mark Assessment Mark HSC Mark Performance Band
2 Chemistry 94/100 98/100 96 6
2 English (Advanced) 91/100 92/100 92 6
2 Legal Studies 96/100 93/100 95 6
2 Mathematics Extension 1 98/100 97/100 98 E4
2 Mathematics Extension 2 95/100 93/100 94 3 E4

UAI: 99.90

Very, very happy... very....

 

[pitted]

UAI: 88.45

i dont want to say anything else

ill get into my course that i want so who cares heres what i got

Units Courses Entered Examination Mark Assessment Mark HSC Mark Performance Band
2 Chemistry 66/100 65/100 66 3
2 Economics 82/100 85/100 84 5
2 English (Advanced) 78/100 87/100 83 5
1 English Extension 1 32/50 41/50 37 E3
1 English Extension 2 30/50 32/50 31 E2
2 Mathematics Extension 1 73/100 76/100 75 E3
2 Mathematics Extension 2 71/100 72/100 72 3 E3

 

[the questions]

Got 97.10

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........

 

[mashi]

99.7

i like cos i did minimal work woot

 

[Lainee]

Congrats everyone! I got 99.5 - SAM was spot on!

Anyone thinking of Comm/Law @ UNSW?

 

[wanton-wonton]

That's what everyone picks when they get a high UAI ...

 

[Lainee]

Correction. That's what -most- people choose when they get a high UAI. Anyone ever told you that sweeping generalisations aren't only wrong, but insulting?