MedVision ad

On line Study Group (2 Viewers)

openside_04

New Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
5
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
resistance

im still confused on aspects of Germany being a totalitarian state.
Could someone please help me with reasons why Nazism was considered not to be a totalitarian regime??
 

Gooba

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
42
Location
Canberra
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
meat_axe said:
im still confused on aspects of Germany being a totalitarian state.
Could someone please help me with reasons why Nazism was considered not to be a totalitarian regime??
Nazism is considered to be a totalitarian regime. What you want to look at is the effectivness of the Nazi party in imposing itself on German society. Look at the effects of the SS and SA, the effectivness of Volksmeinschaft, resistance groups (ie, Edlweiss Pirates), the Hitler youth. Also Propaganda in Germany in relation to social and cultural areas
 

Christie35

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
40
now I'm not sure

a. whether it answers the question and
b. what to write now.


Please help me! I started to write another copy that I will type up if you want to read that. Sorry to ask you this.
Christie35

Assess the attempts by the Palestinians, the Arab nations and the Israleli governments to reach a peace agreement between 1979 - 1996

The creation of Israel brought about increased hostility amongst the neighbouring coutries, particularly Egypt. It initiated the failure of neighbouring countries to recognise the right of Israel to exist, and, after their defeat in the 1947/9 war, Arab countries refused to sign any form of a peace treaty with the Jewish state. A further discouragement for the Arabs was the repitive intervention of the super powers, during and after the war. Before 1979, the concept of peace was overshadowed by the belief that the only solution was armed conflict. During the 1947/9 war - or the "Disaster"- the Palestinians lost another large part of their homeland to the Jews. For the Arab peopulation in Israel, their homeland had ceased to exist and thus they were forced to flee, while the Palestinians who remained in Israel lived in settlements under Jewish control.

On the 29th October, 1956, 100 000 Israeli troops attacked Egypt by way of the Sinai Desert, and within days the Israelis had managed to capture the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Penisula. Physically victory was awarded to Israel, who had also captured the West Bank, occupied the Canal Zone on the 5th November, and gained access to the Suez Canal. However, world support was diversified towarts Egypt. This had a dramatic impact on the 1967 war and created a rift between the Arab world, preventing them from achieving common goals. This only intesified the hostility towards the concept of peace.

However, the 1973 'Kom Kippur' war or the 'Ramadan War' changed these attitudes. All fighting sides realised that this conflict was not being resolved through the use of arms - the only way to resolve this ongoing conflict was through peace.

Egyptian President Anwar Sadat was one of the first leaders in the Middle East to recognise the need for peace. He could see that terrorist attacks only brought about attacks of retaliation. It was with this in mind, and the knowledge that Sadat would need the support of the United States to regain the Sinai, which he would only recieve if he moved towards peace, that Sadat arranged a peace talk. When he was invited to address the Israeli parliament (the Knesset), Sadat clarified that he wanted a permanent peace agreement, but he also demanded Israel's withdrawal from the Occupied Territories gained in the 1967 war, and for her to recognise the Palestinian's rights to self - determination. Menachem Begin refused, but agreed to continue peace talks.

Jimmy Carter, the Democratic President of the United States, was the initator of the Camp David Accords. Months after Sadat addressed the Knesset, Carter persuaded Sadat and Begin to meet him at the Camp David Retreat. They agreed, and together they drafted what is known as the Camp David Accords. These Accords were made up of two agreements. The first, 'A framework for Peace in the Middle East' called for peact negotiations among Egypt, Jordan, Israel and representatives of the Palestinian people to settle the question of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The second, 'A framework for the conclusion of a Peace Treaty between Egypt and Israel' was a draft proposing for the signing of an official peace agreement within the next three months. However, these Accords thoroughly ignored the question of Jeruselem and the future of the Golan Heights.

These Accords were met with opposition on both sides. To begin with, Arabs saw Sadat's actions as the ultimate act of betrayal. As consequence, Egypt was exxpelled from the Arab League, which was ironic, seeing as though President Nassar had been the one to establish the League. However, the main reason for opposition to any form of peace treaty with Israel was because making peace would indicate that the Arabs would have to recognise Israel. Hard line Israelis opposed any conciliation or compromise on any issue with the Arabs. The main opposition arose due to deep concern over Israeli border security.

Opposition by the Arabs led to the destructive assasination of Sadat on 6th October 1981. He was succeded by Hosni Mubarak, who still upholds the treaty today.

However, while conlict appeared to be settled between Egypt and Israel, tensions between Lebanon and Israel grew, made worse by the increasing number of Palestinians entering Lebanon. With the Palestinians came the establishment of many PLO bases and infastructures. In four years, the Israelis invaded Lebanon twice, once in March 1978 in retaliation for a PLO bus hijack, which killed many Israeli civilians. The UN ordered a cease fire in July 1981. However, in June 1982, 172 000 Israeli soldiers invaded once again. This invasion was called the Operation for Peace in Galilee. The Israeli troops aimed to firstly destroy PLO bases, and to secure Israel's 15km wide security zone. They reached Beirut quickly, and launched ariel and artillary bombardment, which continued for 79 days. On the 11th August, Israel agreed to the US brokered ceasefire. This allowed safe passage out of Beirut, Tinisa, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. After this, demonstrators in Israel called for peace.
 

blacmajic

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
55
Location
Randwick
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Some info on Peace initiatives up until the early 70's.
I had to do an assesment on this and i got 18 or 19/ 20, so it has most of the info

*Resolution 181 : November 1947, 33 voted for 13 against-resolution passed.
Arabs upset -legitimised jewish claim to state , not all jews happy some wanted all of palestine
In an effort to block implementation the Arabs began attacks on Jewish villages.

*19th MArch 1948: in an effort to control violence the US declared thst Palestine should be put under UN trustueeship for 10yrs until a gov approved by both was formed -This was harshly attacked by both side therefore a failed plan

*11th June : 4 week truce declared by UN, however during the cease fire Israel managed to obtain illicit weapons from czechoslovakia, The Arabs found out and refused to renew the truce , fighting continued for 10 days.

18th July 1948 : 2nd truce proposed by Bernadotte in which transjordan would annex certain ares , a jewish state would be created , the internationalisation would take place and compensation would be given to the refugees.- this was rejected by both sides , it displeased the Lehi in particular because the very next day the assasinated Bernadotte. The Arabs refused this plan because it legitamises the state of israel.

1949 : After almost a yr of fighting the UN truce commision made efforts to bring the war to an end, 3 seperate truces made , all broken, a 4th and final truce put into place and came into effect the 7th Jan 1949.

June, July : Isreael concluded armistice agreement with Arab reprasentatives from Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria on the Island of Rhodes. Borders were established however they were not international borders, these were not peace treaties, they werw just to prevent the other from moving foreward - Border conflicts continued and eventually escalated into the Suez war. (brought to an end by the UN calling for an immediate cease fireand the withdrawal of occupying troops from Egypt)

1967 six day war : Ended with a UN cease fie also, however took a few days for everyone to cooperate.

28th June : in return for complete and contractual peace with the Arabs , the Israeli gov offered to give back all occupying territories- this was harshly rejected by the Arabs , who passed a resoultion saying " no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no negotiations with it" the Arabs states were unwilling to legitimise state of israel.

22nd Nov 1967, Resolution 242 : this included a just and lasting peace b/w the 2 parties,a withdrawal of israeli forces , freedom of navigation in the international waterways and a resolution for the refugee problem. - after this there seemed a remote possiblity that some Arab states would sign.

1968 war of attrition : eventually ebded with a cease fire in 1970 but shortly afterwards Nasser moved his soviet supplied anti-aircraft missiles closer to the Suez canal, a violation of the cease fire. However tensions died after the Death of Nasser in Sept 1970.

6th oct : war broke out again, UN council met by urgent request of US and USSR, by 14 votes to none they adopted resolution 338, which called upon parties to cease fire.
 

danie

a fool
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
127
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
don't hold this against me but apparently this years ww1 question my teacher said could be on the papal peace note/peace initiatives.
 

Ris

New Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
6
Location
in a small country town in nsw
hey ppls im doing the cold war by correspondance or however u spell it and im finding it hard to get the key things in detail like u would in class if any1 can help at all can they pm me plz
thanks
 

delz

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
35
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Interested

hey I 'm interested in participating I'm doing Russia and the Cold war if any one has notes on these it would be a great help
 

delz

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
35
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Re: Modern Hot Chic

Re : Leni Riefenstahl
If your looking for info there is a personality profile in Excel HSC Modern history by Ron Ringer
 

Meldrum

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
1,270
Location
Gone.
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I'm doing Russia - Trotsky, and Indochina, will have some stuff up soon.
 
Last edited:

kimbawhitelion

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
22
leon trotsky essay

Question 1 ~
Identify the major features of the life of Leon Trotsky in the period 1917 to 1940

“Life is not an easy matter... You cannot live through it without falling into frustration and cynicism unless you have before you a great idea which raises you above personal misery, above weakness, above all kinds of perfidy and baseness.”

This quote, taken from Leon Trotsky himself, reflects the way in which he led his life and the person who he was – “perceptive, imaginative, intelligent and someone who was a tireless worker for what he believed in.” Trotsky was one of the most influential and significant figures who emerged from Russia during the period 1917 to 1940. His life, which spanned an illustrious sixty one years (1879 to 1940), encompassed a variety of achievements and failures, however his most prominent failure was his inability to conquer Stalin in his quest to replace Lenin in his leadership role. From early beginnings, when Trotsky was known as Lev Davidovich Bronstein; to death as a result of the brutality of Stalin’s orders, the major features of Trotsky’s life centre on the political stage of Russia. The major events which took place in Trotsky’s life from 1917 to 1940 include the Tsarist rule being overthrown in 1917 and his return from exile, his involvement with the Bolshevik Party, his leadership of the October Revolution, his connections with the Red Army and defending of revolutionary gains, his establishment of the Left Opposition against Stalin, the power struggle between himself and Stalin, his continual exile and deportment, and his arrival in Mexico in 1937 where he founded the Fourth International, which was the organisation that he helped build across the world to fight for true international socialism. Finally, in 1940 at the age of 61, Trotsky was murdered under the orders of Stalin, when an assassin plunged an ice pick into the head of Leon Trotsky and killed him.


In early 1917, social changes began to take place within Russia as a result of the Revolution and the overthrow of Tsarism. The replacement government, known as the Provisional Government, however, refused to pull out of World War I and break away from capitalism, which meant that they were rendered “incapable of supplying bread, land or peace for Russian workers” . Vladimir Lenin presented the slogan, ‘all power to the Soviets’, which resulted in him reaching similar conclusions to that of Leon Trotsky’s theory of ‘permanent revolution’.
Following the overthrow of the Tsarist government, Trotsky arrived back in Russia in May, after spending time in exile. In Petrograd, Trotsky assumed the role of leading the Interdistrict Committee of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (the RSDLP) – which included both the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks – and joined the newly established Petrograd Soviet of Workers and Soldiers Deputies. Because he disapproved of the support the Mensheviks were providing the Provisional Government and the war effort, Trotsky then later joined the Bolsheviks in July, 1917. In this role, he was second only to Lenin as leader of the Revolution, and became the most influential opponent of Russia’s new government. A Military Revolutionary Committee was founded and headed by Trotsky and in October, the first ever workers state was established, which then saw unprecedented gains for Russia’s working class. Under the government controlled economy, the wealth of Russia was employed in “the best interest of the majority of the people, much unlike the anarchy of capitalism which left the financial resources of the nation to a privileged few” . This workers state “increased life expectancy to double its previous rate, the number of full-time education increased six times and the number of hospital beds increased ten times over” .
The Bolsheviks aimed to overthrow the new Provisional Government and substitute it with a ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ – that is, a government which could be ruled by the Bolshevik's on behalf of the industrial workers and peasants of Russia. “The Bolsheviks succeeded because the Provisional Government was weak and unpopular … when it was attacked, nobody was prepared to defend it. The Bolsheviks had good slogans such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ and ‘All Power to the Soviets’ … this meant that they got the public’s support …A private Bolshevik army (the Red Guards), dedicated to the revolution, was set up and trained under Leon Trotsky … It gave the Bolsheviks the military power to win.”
As a result of Trotsky’s commitment to the Bolsheviks, the Provisional Governments Prime Minister Alexander Kerensky realised that Trotsky presented a major threat to the new government and had him arrested. “Trotsky…caused a sensation at the pre-parliament. He accused the government and the bourgeoisie of encouraging the ‘bony hand of hunger’ to strangle the revolution… that drew fury from the right…Sukhanov thought that they were ‘now taking up arms against the entire old world’…this small party was trying to create an un-heard of proletarian state and a new society…war would surely follow…”
Lavr Kornilov, the General of the Russian Army, sent troops to take control of Petrograd, which meant that Kerensky was now in great danger. Kerensky then called on the Soviets and the Red Guards to protect Petrograd. The Bolsheviks controlled these two organisations, and agreed to Kerensky’s request on the terms that he release members of the Bolsheviks from prison. Trotsky was released on the 23rd of September, and elected Chairman of the Petrograd Soviet. At this stage, Lenin had gone into hiding and because of this; Trotsky assumed the role of leading the preparations for Bolshevik’s seizure of power. In October, he led masses of soldiers and workers to defend Petrograd and ensure the insurrection that brought down the Provisional Government was carried out. This was the second phase of the Russian Revolution.


In November 1917, Lenin appointed Trotsky as the People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs in the new government, and he became a principle figure in negotiations concerning Germany and other Central Powers in 1918. The following month, however, Trotsky resigned from this position as he opposed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk as it made rigorous demands on Russia as a whole. Trotsky then became Commissar of War and Chairman of the Supreme Military Council of Russia. In this role, Trotsky had the difficult task attempting to end Russian involvement in WWI, without conceding any Russian territory to the Central Powers. By using delaying tactics, Trotsky anticipated socialist revolutions would spread from Russia to Germany and Austria-Hungary before he had to sign the Brest-Litovsk Treaty. Eventually, this Treaty resulted in Russia resigning the Ukraine, Finland, the Baltic Provinces, the Caucasus and Poland.
Following the October Revolution, it was decided by Lenin that the Old Russian army would have to be turned into an instrument of the Communist Party. Trotsky began to demobilise the old imperial army and in January 1918, he formed an efficient military forced known as the ‘Red Army of Workers and Peasants’. This army had to be formed quickly, as it was needed to fight the White Army. This White Army comprised of ”some of the Russian forces, both political and military, which opposed the Bolsheviks after the October Revolution and fought against the Red Army …during the Russian Civil War from 1918 to 1921” .
Although Trotsky lacked extensive military skills and training, he was “a talented organiser and easily gained the respect and loyalty of his troops” . Initially this Red Army was only a volunteer army; however the broad losses suffered by the Soviet Government resulted in them needing to use conscription to fulfil soldier numbers in June 1918. Lenin was so pleased with Trotsky’s achievement that in 1919 he pronounced, “Show me another man who could have practically created a model army in a year and won the respect of the military specialist as well.”
It was mostly due to Trotsky’s strong military management that the Bolsheviks eventually won the Civil War (1918 -1921). This ensured the survival of the Bolshevik government, and resulted in Trotsky being elected as member of Communist Party Central Committee. “Much to the disappointment of his faithful supporters, Trotsky advocated the idea of State control of trade unions and their merging with government bodies. This caused him to lose his support of former Mensheviks, especially Alexandra Kollontai” .
Trotsky was second only to Lenin in the Politburo (the Communist Party’s highest decision-making body), and Lenin viewed Trotsky as extremely able. In 1921, Alexandra Kollontai published a Pamphlet called the “Workers Opposition”, which called for the trade unionists to be given more political freedom. The pamphlet also argued before the government tries to ‘rid Soviet institutions of the bureaucracy that lurks within them, the party must first rid itself of its own bureaucracy’. Trotsky’s prestige in the government was now very high and those who held these anti-bureaucratic views were either dismissed from office or were sent abroad as members of the diplomatic service. Trotsky and Lenin clashed in 1920 over the role of trade unions – Trotsky unsuccessfully demanded that the government make trade unions organs of the state so as to discipline them and maintain industrial efficiency. Despite this disagreement, the two were drawn together again by the 1921 Kronshtadt Rebellion against the Bolshevik government, when Trotsky used military support to suppress the rebellion, with the assistance and support of Lenin.


The disagreements of the New Economic Policy left Vladmir Lenin extremely exhausted and his health began to deteriorate. Dora Kaplan’s attempted assassination in 1918 also meant that Lenin suffered from “severe headaches, limiting his sleep and fatigue constantly plagued him” . When he had the first of many strokes in 1922, the Communist Party (which was now renamed from the Bolshevik Party) official, Joseph Stalin began strategically planning for the control of the party. Stalin was voted in as General Secretary later that year, resulting in him holding a number of leading positions in various parties. In 1923 Trotsky led the first opposition to Stalin, demonstrating the suppression of democracy within the Communist Party. These ideals were affirmed by other leading Communist Party members, but no one from the Politburo supported these sentiments.
Trotsky also strongly disagreed with Stalin’s belief of ‘socialism in one country’, which outlined that the success of the Russian revolution was not dependant on the revolution spreading throughout the world.
Despite Trotsky’s prestige and reputation which he upheld as a military leader, it was Stalin who controlled the Party organisation. Following Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin established a ruling coalition along with Grigory Zinovyev and Lev Kamenev, to which Trotsky was rendered unable to defend himself against damaging criticism. “The idea of a trio – Stalin, Zinoviev, Kamenev – had long been established. Their spear-point was directed at me. The whole plan of the conspirators was that after they had mustered enough support in the organizations, they would be crowned legitimate successors to Lenin.”
Trotsky’s major chance of gaining power from Lenin’s death was for Lenin’s final testament to be published, however this never occurred and in 1925, Stalin was able to arrange for Trotsky to be removed from power altogether. Though some of Trotsky’s supporters pleaded with him to organise a military coup as he was in a goof position to organise it, he rejected the idea and resigned from his position instead. As a result of this, he lost his position as Commissar of War in 1925. In 1926, Trotsky created a coalition known as the Left Opposition. “The Left Opposition was a faction within the Communist Party of the Soviet Union during 1923-1927. It was formed in response (and in opposition to) the rise of Stalinism. Leon Trotsky was the de-facto leader of the Left Opposition. After Stalin consolidated his power, the Left Opposition was banned and Trotsky was barred from the Politburo.”
A result of Trotsky’s continual public criticism of Stalin, in 1927 he was expelled from the Communist Party in addition to the Politburo. “The second chapter of the revolution had begun – the fight against Trotskyism. In reality, it was a fight against the ideological legacy of Lenin.” In the following year, Trotsky was exiled under orders from Stalin. As he was still advocating world revolution, many countries refused to take him in. Trotsky eventually moved to Soviet Central Asia, and in 1929 Stalin ordered him to leave USSR altogether. As he was refused admission by most countries, Trotsky lived in Turkey until 1933, when he moved to France. In April 1934, the French government issued a decree ordering Trotsky’s deportation. After he was exiled from France, it was not until June 1935 that Norway accepted him. Shortly afterwards, the Norwegian government was encouraged to expel Trotsky as well. Due to pressure from Stalin, the Norwegian government placed him under house arrest before he was deported to Mexico in 1939, when he went to live with his own family. He resumed his self–appointed role of the promotion of world revolution whilst he was still exile, and later founded the Fourth International which was an organisation endorsing Trotsky’s goal of world revolution and in opposition to Stalinism (as Joseph Stalin’s rule became known).
In April 1937, Trotsky was brought before a commission of enquiry in New York, which was led by John Dewey. Following this, Trotsky was found not guilty of charges of treason made by Stalin. Later that year, Trotsky’s son, Leon Sedov died in mysterious circumstances in Paris, and it is widely accepted that he was murdered by the GPU.

During his time in exile, Leon Trotsky continued his prolific writings. From 1929 to 1940, he published the journal, “Bulletin of the Opposition”, in which he supplied articles on matters such as Soviet politics and international affairs. In 1930, he published his famous autobiography, “My Life”, which is re-known for its self – analysis. One of Trotsky’s finest works appeared from 1931 and 1933, entitled, “History of the Russian Revolution”. Texts which also emerged from Trotsky’s time in exile include, “The Russian Betrayed” (1937), and “Stalin” (1941).

After one assassination attempt in May 1940, Leon Trotsky was murdered following Stalin’s orders in August of the same year, by Ramon Mercader, a Spanish agent for the Soviet Secret Police.

As one of Soviet Russia’s most brilliant Marxist leaders, Trotsky was “a man of action” , thinker and a writer, whole political and literary activity spanned the first four decades of the 20th Century. His skills as an organiser and military strategist did a lot to ensure the success of the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 and the defeat of the Bolshevik enemies in the following Civil War. Trotsky’s writings on Bolshevism, Marxism, and world revolution made a “highly important contribution to both political theory and historical literature” .
“Few politicians have aroused more passion and controversy as Trotsky. A classical Marxist, Trotsky was deeply committed to the main tenet of Marxism – the theory of world revolution – and he saw social upheaval as global, rather than local or national in scope.” His conviction in world revolution effectively created a commitment to radical domestic policies and to the use of severe measures when needed. For Trotsky, the success of the Bolshevik revolution was a necessary factor of the process of world revolution, which is one of the reasons why he refused to sway from the use of violence against Bolshevik enemies. Yet despite his ability to be ruthless and merciless, Trotsky failed to match Stalin’s ability to manipulate and control other party members.
“I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it all of evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full.” – Leon Trotsky .

**hope it helps!**
 

kimbawhitelion

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
22
“Leon Trotsky was a more logical and likely successor to Stalin”

Question 2 ~
“Leon Trotsky was a more logical and likely successor to Stalin”
In light of this statement, why was Trotsky unable to prevent the triumph of Stalin as leader of the USSR?

When Vladmir Lenin died in 1924, Leon Trotsky was the assumed heir apparent. His involvement during the years 1917 up until 1924 was seconded only to Lenin himself in the context of his contribution to leadership roles of this time. Upon Lenin's death, however, it was actually Stalin, rather than Trotsky, who held the prime position to succeed Lenin. Stalin held four highly important positions, being Commissar for Nationalities, Liaison Officer between Politburo and Orgburo, Head of the Worker’s Inspectorate and General Secretary of the Communist Party. Although it appears that Stalin’s supremacy over Trotsky was only obvious in the political arena, it was also evident in a social context as a result of events to which Trotsky failed to appear at, such as Lenin’s funeral, and the result of Lenin’s final testament never being publicly read out directly after his death. Stalin held the ability to manipulate other party members and boasted strength and will of character; he was an intense and coercive leader who overpowered Trotsky in the struggle for power in the USSR. Despite Trotsky’s succession over Lenin as appearing to be of a more likely and logical nature, he could not prevent Stalin from triumphing as leader due to his lack of political power and character strength.


Trotsky played a highly influential role in the context of establishing Bolshevik control in Russia. He held a leading position in the Bolshevik seizure of power in the October and November revolutions of 1917, and many people believed he was a hero for his country for his extremely successful efforts in organising the Red Army during the Civil War. Leon Trotsky has been described as, “…one of Russia's most brilliant Marxist leaders … a man of action, a thinker and a writer … and deeply committed to cause…” Although Trotsky had the ability to achieve the loyalty and respect of numerous men as seen in his creation of the Red Army, he unfortunately could not establish authority above his own contemporaries by simply persuading them or using “sympathetic attention to the views of men of lesser intellectual calibre than himself.”
The apparent likelihood of Trotsky succeeding in stepping into the role of leadership which Lenin held was considered by many to be certain. The strong leadership qualities which Trotsky held, however, were not quite as expansive as once thought. Although he did hold respectable attributes which were well utilised in a possible leadership position, his strength in character was lacking depth and force. Due to a high degree of intelligence and deficiency of persona, Trotsky was unable to claim the position that many saw as rightfully his.

Trotsky’s inability to conquer Stalin in the quest for Lenin’s position resulted because, “he [Trotsky] did not realise the danger that Stalin posed and completely underestimated Stalin’s ambition and ability to manipulate the party for his own political gain…” A crucial sector of the reasons explaining why Trotsky failed to beat Stalin lie within the boundaries of Lenin’s funeral and Stalin’s distortion of that event, and Lenin’s final testament. Following Lenin’s death in 1924, Trotsky was misinformed of Lenin’s funeral date and did not appear. Though this was Stalin’s work, it reflected negatively on Trotsky as it appeared he did not care for Lenin or his ideals of Marxism and merely wanted to claim the position to exert unfavourable power. This was far from reality, yet this is how it was presented to the majority of the public. As a result, they saw Stalin in a more positive light and believed he was the ‘better’ successor to Lenin, instead of Trotsky. “Trotsky also failed make an appearance at Lenin's funeral, where Stalin 'stood out as the first disciple of the late leader, and in the process disassociating himself with Lenin in the eyes of the people and the Party. With his unpopular views on World Revolution, in contrast to Stalin's idea of Socialism in One Country, he appeared to be anti-Russian in his foreign interests, a view which was not much helped by his Menshevik background and reputation as a Jewish intellectual. Trotsky had therefore failed to act in order to prevent Stalin achieving supreme power in Russia, and it was his lack of active opposition to Stalin that saw any chance of power he had slip away from him.” The failure to appear at Lenin’s funeral proved to be extremely detrimental to Trotsky’s attempted triumph as leader. Prior to Lenin’s funeral, Trotsky was seen by many as a ‘more logical and likely successor to Lenin than Stalin’, however following his non-appearance at Lenin’s funeral, it was soon seen by the public that Trotsky was self centred and did not care for the people of Russia due to Stalin’s misrepresentation of the situation.
The fact that Lenin’s final testament (also known as his will) was not read out to the officials until May 1924 is another crucial reason as to why Trotsky was unable to prevent the succession of Stalin as leader of the USSR. Stalin’s biggest challenge during the ‘struggle for power’ was the opinion which Lenin held about him when he was still alive. In Lenin’s opinion, Trotsky was a ‘more likely and logical successor’, and he voiced this opinion in his final testament. “Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary-General, has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution. Comrade Trotsky, on the other hand, as his struggles against the C.C. on the question of the People’s Commissariat for Communications has already proved is distinguished not only by outstanding ability. He is personally perhaps the most capable man in the present C.C., but he has displayed excessive self-assurance and shown excessive preoccupation with the purely administrative side of the work.” Trotsky agreed to the concealment of the testament, mainly because he did not wish to cause a split in the Party that might lead to Civil War, despite the fact he had the Red Army behind him (due to his position as War Commissar), his status as a Civil War hero and the Army's respect for him. “Trotsky still had Lenin's Testament behind him, which, if presented, Stalin's chances of succession would have been ruined. He also had a mostly loyal Red Army behind him.” As a result of the concealment of the testament, Trotsky’s main weapon against Stalin had been “voluntarily sheathed” , and he would have had to defy the Central Committee to resurrect the issue of Lenin's Testament. This testament was crucial to the success of Trotsky as a leader of Russia; unfortunately for Trotsky and his fellow political supporters, he failed to present it to the officials. “Lenin also personally made sure that Trotsky received a copy of his Testament in order to expose Stalin in front of the Central Committee. Trotsky, however, was to fail to perform both these things, and in so continued to play Russia into the 'iron hands' of Stalin.” Thus Trotsky effectively denied himself an exceptionally high chance of gaining the role previously held by Lenin, due to his weakness of political character.
The debate regarding modernisation between Trotsky and Stalin began to emerge in the 1920’s. Whilst Stalin supported the view of ‘socialism in one country’, Trotsky supported the theory of ‘world revolution’. At that time, if either Stalin or Trotsky was to become the leader of the Russia, certain implications would most definitely have ensued. For Trotsky, it would have meant that the New Economic Policy would have been rejected and disabled, as he believed it was a betrayal of the revolution. This would have resulted in Russia having had to rely on foreign countries in order to modernise. If Stalin was to take the lead however, he proposed that his view of ‘socialism in one country’ was a direct expansion on Leninism, which would involve a party seizing power and establishing political elite with a central decision making committee, economic control (such as War Communism and the 5 year plans), censorship in the form of the Pravda (the only newspaper allowed to be published), and finally, coercion, such as the Cheka. The theory behind Stalin’s belief was effectively ‘revolution from above’, and was efficiently able to distort the situation into a portrayal of Trotsky as being ‘impractical’ and ‘unrealistic’, and that he had no faith or concern for the Russian public. This is a highly obvious example of how Stalin used his power at the time and his ideals to influence and control circumstances in which Trotsky lost many supporters as a result. Trotsky could not succeed over Stalin in this case, because he held neither the ability nor the will to alter public perception of Stalin; however Stalin was more than willing to take advantage of the situation to achieve his own personal goals and to manipulate the way in which the public conceived Trotsky as a potential leader for their country.
Stalin used his political power and personality not only to manipulate the Russian people’s view of Trotsky’s belief in world revolution, but also his involvement with varied political parties. When the Social Revolutionaries spilt in 1903, Trotsky considered that the most important aspect was party unity and therefore he sided with the Mensheviks. Yet after the July Days in 1917, Trotsky became a member of the Bolsheviks, and followed Lenin. Stalin took advantage of Trotsky’s past connections with these parties in order to promote him as being a traitor and not loyal – both of which are extremely undesirable attributes for a political leader to possess in the eyes of the Russian public. This was untrue of Lenin and Trotsky’s relationship, “Trotsky also shared the view with Lenin of the Revolution as the beginning of World Revolution, and not Socialism in One Country. He [Lenin] confided in Trotsky to oppose Stalin…” In his creation of an false situation, Stalin managed to turn even more supporters away from Trotsky, as they were beginning to believe that he was ‘hardly the image of a dedicated Leninist’. This also resulted in Stalin gaining more power in order to become the ultimate leader of the USSR, due to Trotsky’s difficulties in overpowering Stalin.
Though Leon Trotsky was a more likely and logical successor to Stalin, in the struggle for power following Lenin’s death, Trotsky was unable to outmanoeuvre Stalin in 1923 in attempts to gain political prestige. Prior to Lenin’s death, some members of other political parties had began scheme and plan in order to benefit from the struggle for power that all knew was inevitable. Some were wary of Trotsky as he had “imperious ways and authoritarian style of leadership, reinforced by a personal insensitivity…” Stalin, however, held many political positions and used these to ‘outshine’ Trotsky. His positions included General Secretary of the Communist Party, Commissar for Nationalities, Liaison officer between Politburo and Orgburo and Head of the Workers Inspectorate. Stalin held a strong position of organisation in the role of General Secretary, as all documents were processed through him. “Stalin’s organisational placement gave him power that he could use to consolidate his position…”
In 1922, the triumvate of Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev was formed within the Politburo and aimed to destroy Trotsky in his attempts at leadership, as well as question the growing bureaucratisation within the party. “Indeed, such was Trotsky’s lack of perception that it took him a long while to realise that a triumvate was operating against him… he took each issue as it came and attacked as the urge took him, he had not understanding of political timing…the discomfiture of Trotsky could only work in their [truimvate’s] favour…” Stalin and the triumvate strongly accentuated Trotsky’s conflicts with the dead Lenin Trotsky’s lack of faith in the Russian proletariat, “ and through the skilful manipulation of personnel, the troika [triumvate] was able to discredit Trotsky.” . Though Trotsky tried to contest the triumvate’s argument, his view was not politically strong enough to fully challenge and override Stalin’s authority, therefore resulting in a later victory for Stalin.


Trotsky was unable to prevent the succession of Stalin, despite the fact that he was a more likely and logical leader to have followed Lenin. Trotsky did not maintain a politically strong character which had sufficient ability to overthrow Stalin’s attempts to over take Lenin’s role, and, “…his [Trotsky’s] pride and arrogance prevented him from posing any real opposition to Stalin…” Trotsky’s enemies were not only in the form of Stalin, but also of the numerous Stalin supporters. “At the end of 1924, political commissars demanded Trotsky be dismissed; in January 1925 he resigned from the Red Army…On November 7, 1927, Trotsky and Zinoviev called for street demonstrations in Leningrad and Moscow in protest against Stalinist policies…Both men were expelled from the Party…” Stalin believed himself to be “creative’, and not as a ‘dogmatic’ Marxist … he placed great emphasis on experience as a guide to action … some commentators, Trotsky among them … saw him [Stalin] as mainly concerned with manipulating Marxism-Leninism to suit his own ends…” Trotsky was originally certainly a more ‘logical and likely successor to Lenin’ because of his close connections with the powerful leader, such as his strong relationship with both Lenin and his party. Trotsky’s held insufficient personal power, political power, strength of character, and conviction to override Stalin’s attempt to take the leadership position which many saw as rightfully Trotsky’s. This meant that Stalin succeeded in the struggle for power, and overcame any virtuous representations which Trotsky may have once held in the public’s eye. “Since Lenin had also revealed that he was planning to retire, his move in speaking through Trotsky could only mean one thing: he saw Trotsky as his natural successor. This blew Stalin to the core…his prime objective was simply to keep Trotsky out [of a political position]…” For Stalin, Lenin’s belief in Trotsky provided him with the means and the motivation to seize the situation which arose following Lenin’s death and manipulate it for his own political benefit. This, of course, rendered Trotsky powerless to stop Stalin from becoming the ‘more logical and likely successor’ to Lenin.
 

delz

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
35
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Cold War

Hey does anyone have notes on the ' influence of variuos groups on the creation and maintenance of a Cold War culture in the United States between 1945 and 1961' thats the part i really need help with, anyother notes on ww1, russia & trotsky & The Cold war would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Dela
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top