Oxidation/Reduction question (1 Viewer)

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Hey, I was just wondering...

In the data sheet, for example, wouldn't the strongest oxidant naturally be the weakest reductant?
 

flicka08

New Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
22
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
yea thats right
just remember the data sheet is the standard reduction potentials so the strongest reductant will be at the very top
 

Undermyskin

Self-delusive
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
587
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Or at the bottom. I've got the sheet where Potassium is at the bottom! Just need to look at E and find the smallest number then it's the strongest reductant
 

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
So if that's what you're saying...

Strongest reducing agent = K+
Strongest oxidising agent = K
Weakest reducing agent = K
Strongest oxidising agent = K+
?
 

undalay

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
Ashfield
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
minijumbuk said:
So if that's what you're saying...

Strongest reducing agent = K+
Strongest oxidising agent = K
Weakest reducing agent = K
Strongest oxidising agent = K+
?
Reducing agent, undergoes oxidation, oxidation is loss.
K+ isn't going to lose any more electrons (it's gonna be very hard)
Thus its a very very weak reducing agent.

On the standardp potential table:
F2 is the best oxidising agent.
K is the best reducing agent.
K+ is the weakest oxidisnig agent
F- is the weakest reducing agent.
 

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
So why would F- be a weaker reducing agent than K+?
 

undalay

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
1,002
Location
Ashfield
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
because i said on the table.

There is no equation for oxidation of K+ on the table.
So it cannot be determined, although i would suspect K+ would be weaker in reality.
 

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Argh, that's the mistake I did, and I lost the mark in the prac. assessment T_T
 

Tim035

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
857
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
You could also remember that oxidation and reduction potential are linked to ionization energy and electron affinity levels.
Ionization levels decrease down the periodic table and increase across, but there are some irregularities if the outer sub shell has a full or exactly half filled electron configuration. Lower ionization levels mean less energy is needed to remove the least tightly bound electron and so the element will more easily oxized.

Electron affinity levels always have negative associated values as the system loses energy for this process to occur. Large negative values occur in atoms towards the top right of the periodic table with exclusion of noble gases. Less negative values occur around the alkaline earths Be, Mg, Ca etc... Large negative values mean the element is more readily going to except an electron thus becomming reduced.



..... Actually on second thought, just learn the order based on that table they give you.
 

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Tim035 said:
You could also remember that oxidation and reduction potential are linked to ionization energy and electron affinity levels.
Ionization levels decrease down the periodic table and increase across, but there are some irregularities if the outer sub shell has a full or exactly half filled electron configuration. Lower ionization levels mean less energy is needed to remove the least tightly bound electron and so the element will more easily oxized.

Electron affinity levels always have negative associated values as the system loses energy for this process to occur. Large negative values occur in atoms towards the top right of the periodic table with exclusion of noble gases. Less negative values occur around the alkaline earths Be, Mg, Ca etc... Large negative values mean the element is more readily going to except an electron thus becomming reduced.



..... Actually on second thought, just learn the order based on that table they give you.

The table they gave me was a table with radicals, hence I could not use ionisation energy, nor electronegativity.
 

Tim035

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
857
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
minijumbuk said:
The table they gave me was a table with radicals, hence I could not use ionisation energy, nor electronegativity.
Radicals still follow the normal rules of oxidation potential as a matter of fact the rules stand stronger in the sense that ionization levels will increase in a linear fashion until the element reaches a noble gas configuration at which point an expodential jump will occur. I was trying to increase your understanding whilst confirming your own beliefs- Think about it, if an element has a high ioniziation potential it is going to have a low electron affinity level and vice versa;

Just learn it in terms of the standard potentials sheet they give you kid...
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top