breadcrumbs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
- Messages
- 297
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
after the trial when my teacher told us u didnt have to write solely on defences i was actually fumingggggTHAT CRIME ESSAY LITERALLY COST ME SO MANY MARKS
after the trial when my teacher told us u didnt have to write solely on defences i was actually fumingggggTHAT CRIME ESSAY LITERALLY COST ME SO MANY MARKS
pleaseee our legal teacher told us that before and half of the grade forgotafter the trial when my teacher told us u didnt have to write solely on defences i was actually fuminggggg
Wait so can I check my raw trial marks and see how I'd go in HSC?Idk where to send this but I've improved my raw mark ATAR calculator by a ton:
Raw Mark ATAR Calculator v3
docs.google.com
- The raw mark conversion is now effectively flawless for any aligned mark above 70 (except in eng ext 1/2 and ancient), after a few painstaking hours I've managed to deduce the exact band cutoffs for each subject +/- 1 mark and hence used linear interpolation from there, like NESA does - you can test with any 2022 mark from rawmarks.info and unless I've messed up a data entry, it will provide the exact same aligned mark. Keep in mind all data is from 2022, I might add more years later but adding them literally takes hours. What this mainly means is that the maths ext 1/2 alignment is nuts and the physics alignment sucks because of last year's exam difficulties
- I made it look a bit nicer I guess
- The aligned mark to scaled mark conversion has been improved significantly, I've excluded the mean data which I shouldn't have included because its not a conversion, and adjusted the equations to function below known data where previously they just went to +/- infinity
- The actual ATAR calculation now incorporates separated formulas for each ATAR "section" so it is pretty much a perfect aggregate->atar conversion given 2022 data
- I did some quick tests of the aligned->ATAR conversion on some of the ATARs published in the ATAR reveal thread last year (can be done by trial and erroring to find the raw mark for each aligned mark) and it consistently outperformed the Matrix ATAR calculator and was on par with UAC ATAR Compass in terms of accuracy, though with some obvious variation within the multiple raw marks of each aligned mark. Keep in mind that my calculations use multiple decimal places (like UAC does, so the ATAR output can depend on which raw mark you provide within each aligned mark) and the other ATAR calculators typically use multiple years of data so it's not a 1:1 comparison.
I hope this is helpful for people, I'm happy to add any subjects which people specifically want. I'll probably add a few more subjects and then make a full thread with it.
Assuming they're the same difficulty as last years HSC, yes! Keep in mind it obviously can't account for your school assessment mark and obviously you'll improve between trials and the HSC so it's not a 'prediction' so much as an indication of where you're currently at.Wait so can I check my raw trial marks and see how I'd go in HSC?
which subjects r u planning on adding nextAssuming they're the same difficulty as last years HSC, yes! Keep in mind it obviously can't account for your school assessment mark and obviously you'll improve between trials and the HSC so it's not a 'prediction' so much as an indication of where you're currently at.
whatever ones people ask for that have enough data on rawmarks.infowhich subjects r u planning on adding next
english standard scaling is roughI LITERALLY PUT MY ENG TRIAL MARK AND IM CRYING THE SCALED MARK HELPPPPPP
Do we need to make a copy to use itIdk where to send this but I've improved my raw mark ATAR calculator by a ton:
Raw Mark ATAR Calculator v3
docs.google.com
- The raw mark conversion is now effectively flawless for any aligned mark above 70 (except in eng ext 1/2 and ancient), after a few painstaking hours I've managed to deduce the exact band cutoffs for each subject +/- 1 mark and hence used linear interpolation from there, like NESA does - you can test with any 2022 mark from rawmarks.info and unless I've messed up a data entry, it will provide the exact same aligned mark. Keep in mind all data is from 2022, I might add more years later but adding them literally takes hours. What this mainly means is that the maths ext 1/2 alignment is nuts and the physics alignment sucks because of last year's exam difficulties
- I made it look a bit nicer I guess
- The aligned mark to scaled mark conversion has been improved significantly, I've excluded the mean data which I shouldn't have included because its not a conversion, and adjusted the equations to function below known data where previously they just went to +/- infinity
- The actual ATAR calculation now incorporates separated formulas for each ATAR "section" so it is pretty much a perfect aggregate->atar conversion given 2022 data
- I did some quick tests of the aligned->ATAR conversion on some of the ATARs published in the ATAR reveal thread last year (can be done by trial and erroring to find the raw mark for each aligned mark) and it consistently outperformed the Matrix ATAR calculator and was on par with UAC ATAR Compass in terms of accuracy, though with some obvious variation within the multiple raw marks of each aligned mark. Keep in mind that my calculations use multiple decimal places (like UAC does, so the ATAR output can depend on which raw mark you provide within each aligned mark) and the other ATAR calculators typically use multiple years of data so it's not a 1:1 comparison.
I hope this is helpful for people, I'm happy to add any subjects which people specifically want. I'll probably add a few more subjects and then make a full thread with it.
business studies please if you get a chancewhatever ones people ask for that have enough data on rawmarks.info
so ur saying to get a e4 in mx2 last yr u needed a 61/100Idk where to send this but I've improved my raw mark ATAR calculator by a ton:
Raw Mark ATAR Calculator v3
docs.google.com
- The raw mark conversion is now effectively flawless for any aligned mark above 70 (except in eng ext 1/2 and ancient), after a few painstaking hours I've managed to deduce the exact band cutoffs for each subject +/- 1 mark and hence used linear interpolation from there, like NESA does - you can test with any 2022 mark from rawmarks.info and unless I've messed up a data entry, it will provide the exact same aligned mark. Keep in mind all data is from 2022, I might add more years later but adding them literally takes hours. What this mainly means is that the maths ext 1/2 alignment is nuts and the physics alignment sucks because of last year's exam difficulties
- I made it look a bit nicer I guess
- The aligned mark to scaled mark conversion has been improved significantly, I've excluded the mean data which I shouldn't have included because its not a conversion, and adjusted the equations to function below known data where previously they just went to +/- infinity
- The actual ATAR calculation now incorporates separated formulas for each ATAR "section" so it is pretty much a perfect aggregate->atar conversion given 2022 data
- I did some quick tests of the aligned->ATAR conversion on some of the ATARs published in the ATAR reveal thread last year (can be done by trial and erroring to find the raw mark for each aligned mark) and it consistently outperformed the Matrix ATAR calculator and was on par with UAC ATAR Compass in terms of accuracy, though with some obvious variation within the multiple raw marks of each aligned mark. Keep in mind that my calculations use multiple decimal places (like UAC does, so the ATAR output can depend on which raw mark you provide within each aligned mark) and the other ATAR calculators typically use multiple years of data so it's not a 1:1 comparison.
I hope this is helpful for people, I'm happy to add any subjects which people specifically want. I'll probably add a few more subjects and then make a full thread with it.
look at physics broalso why is chemistry aligning so trash
thats crazyyyso ur saying to get a e4 in mx2 last yr u needed a 61/100
yepDo we need to make a copy to use it
will do rnbusiness studies please if you get a chance
WHY DOES IT SOUND SO EASYYso ur saying to get a e4 in mx2 last yr u needed a 61/100
BECAUSE IT ISWHY DOES IT SOUND SO EASYY
WHY DOES 60% OF THE STATE FAIL TO GET 61/100 THEN ARENT THEY SMARTBECAUSE IT IS
(and also apparently last years exam was hard or smth)