You can't square and then take the square root of.... otherwise all neg. become pos
E Estel Tutor Joined Nov 12, 2003 Messages 1,261 Gender Male HSC 2005 Jun 2, 2004 #21 You can't square and then take the square root of.... otherwise all neg. become pos
Zarathustra Dasein Joined Sep 28, 2003 Messages 581 Location The ficticious world of subject, substance, "reaso Gender Male HSC 2004 Jun 2, 2004 #22 Why is it then that certain actions are prohibited? Who says all negative numbers aren't positive What's the theory behind you can't take the square then the square root.
Why is it then that certain actions are prohibited? Who says all negative numbers aren't positive What's the theory behind you can't take the square then the square root.
C CM_Tutor Moderator Moderator Joined Mar 11, 2004 Messages 2,642 Gender Male HSC N/A Jun 2, 2004 #23 sqrt(x^2) = |x|
G Giant Lobster Active Member Joined Jul 3, 2003 Messages 1,322 Location asdads Gender Male HSC 2004 Jun 3, 2004 #24 what he did doesnt follow logically he treated 4 like a variable sqrt4 = 2 always sqrtx^2 = |x| x^2 = c^2 (c constant) x = c or -c
what he did doesnt follow logically he treated 4 like a variable sqrt4 = 2 always sqrtx^2 = |x| x^2 = c^2 (c constant) x = c or -c
JamiL Member Joined Jan 31, 2004 Messages 704 Location in the northen hemisphere (who saids australia is Gender Male HSC 2005 Jun 6, 2004 #25 no eg x^2=9 therefore x= 3/-3 but (x^2)^(1/2)=3 therefore 3=3 u assume the number is positive in a sqare root unless otherwise stated therefore if i right -(x^2)^(1/2)=3 therefore -3=3 and that is rong
no eg x^2=9 therefore x= 3/-3 but (x^2)^(1/2)=3 therefore 3=3 u assume the number is positive in a sqare root unless otherwise stated therefore if i right -(x^2)^(1/2)=3 therefore -3=3 and that is rong
Xayma Lacking creativity Joined Sep 6, 2003 Messages 5,953 Gender Undisclosed HSC N/A Jun 6, 2004 #26 Originally posted by Giant Lobster what he did doesnt follow logically he treated 4 like a variable Click to expand... at least it looks more logical then 1=2. I deliberatly didnt use sqrt and used ^1/2 because it doesnt imply a sign.
Originally posted by Giant Lobster what he did doesnt follow logically he treated 4 like a variable Click to expand... at least it looks more logical then 1=2. I deliberatly didnt use sqrt and used ^1/2 because it doesnt imply a sign.
G Giant Lobster Active Member Joined Jul 3, 2003 Messages 1,322 Location asdads Gender Male HSC 2004 Jun 8, 2004 #27 yeah. the absence of (-) implies (+) well anyway, i fell for that ^1/2 thingy in yr 11 so aha
H haz_it_all Member Joined Aug 6, 2003 Messages 137 Jun 12, 2004 #28 i can show that 1 is rounded up 1/3 = 0.3333333... 2/3 = 0.3333...+ 0.3333... = 0.6666666 3/3 = 0.3333...+ 0.3333... + 0.3333... = 0.9999999 this means 1 is actual equal to 0.999999
i can show that 1 is rounded up 1/3 = 0.3333333... 2/3 = 0.3333...+ 0.3333... = 0.6666666 3/3 = 0.3333...+ 0.3333... + 0.3333... = 0.9999999 this means 1 is actual equal to 0.999999
E Estel Tutor Joined Nov 12, 2003 Messages 1,261 Gender Male HSC 2005 Jun 12, 2004 #29 actually... 1 is equal to 0.99999...
JamiL Member Joined Jan 31, 2004 Messages 704 Location in the northen hemisphere (who saids australia is Gender Male HSC 2005 Jun 12, 2004 #30 yep 1=0.99999999999999999.... its the same thing