Hi! I was wondering what is the level of skill and detail i need in the paper exam (specifically your section 2) for visual arts to even be considered for a state ranking? All my friends are really competitive and the only subject I get high 90s for is visual arts so I really want to do well for this subject!!! (even if its not as "prestigious" as others)
some questions if you can spare the time!
1) I usually choose 2 artist (1 artwork each) for my section two because I like having more in depth ones rather than a variety. I only make subtle links between them in my responses. Is 2 artists too little and should my response be more "comparative" or analytical?
2) Does the fame/wellknownness (idk what that word it ) of the artist/artwork matter? Obviously i cant do a made up one but does it matter to the examiner if they know about the work or not??
3) I usually get 23-25 in section 2 (practice paper and exam paper) and my analysis is just straightforward and I like to include 1 or 2 quotes. What are some other elements i can use to boost up the quality of my response?
4) If anyone can spare a sample or full version of a state ranker's essay that would be great!!
Thanks for your time!
some questions if you can spare the time!
1) I usually choose 2 artist (1 artwork each) for my section two because I like having more in depth ones rather than a variety. I only make subtle links between them in my responses. Is 2 artists too little and should my response be more "comparative" or analytical?
2) Does the fame/wellknownness (idk what that word it ) of the artist/artwork matter? Obviously i cant do a made up one but does it matter to the examiner if they know about the work or not??
3) I usually get 23-25 in section 2 (practice paper and exam paper) and my analysis is just straightforward and I like to include 1 or 2 quotes. What are some other elements i can use to boost up the quality of my response?
4) If anyone can spare a sample or full version of a state ranker's essay that would be great!!
Thanks for your time!