millencolinstar
New Member
thanks for the reply...
Even if your courses have similar scaling, they might have very different aligning. You can't just make this assumption. You need to estimate your aligned marks using the same methods as the HSC markers - specifically, the Board's standards packages.matt_f64 said:ok im starting to understand!!! so if my exam marks for all my subjects were say 70, and they were all on the same scaling level as physics, then my aligned mark would actually be say 85 (i dont no exactly but u get the point) and then my scaled mark for the UAI would be say 78 or somethin.???
cos most of my subjects get scaled up... physics, economics, adv eng, 2uMaths... and im looking at gettin into the low 80s for all my subjects, so wud that mean my aligned marks would all be closer to the 90s, and i can put aligned marks closer to the 90s in SAM ?
That's the process that would be followed if all of the relevant information was available and we wanted to calculate UAIs exactly. In reality, no data concerning raw marks is published (except for the few exceptions where individual students have applied for their marks). SAM therefore skips the intermediate step in that process and attemps to estimate scaled marks directly from aligned marks using statistics published by the UAC. This is the best that can be done at the moment.Techie said:So does SAM take the aligned mark for a year, work out what the raw mark would have been, and then apply scaling to figure out your UAI? (If that's not a trade secret)
The Board has stated that a raw mark of 100% always equates to an aligned mark of 100%, and a raw mark of 0 always equates to an aligned mark of 0.googleplex said:so did you just assume 100 in those subjects went to 100, or did someone you know get 100 raw ? D:
at the start of this thread there are a few examples from last few years.... http://www.boredofstudies.org/community/showthread.php?t=34578&page=1&pp=15Lorie said:what kind of raw mark do you think i'll need for a band 6 in IPT???
Where can i find any stats from previous years about it??
There are two types of 'raw' marks: raw examination marks and moderated assessment marks. Strictly speaking, this second one isn't a raw mark, because it's been moderated. But because the moderating process places assessment marks on the same scale as the raw examination marks, they can be viewed in the same light. Moderated assessment marks are calculated to one decimal place, which is where the floating point numbers came from.impulse_17 said:why are raw marks determined to 1 dec. pl.?
like in the 2003 maths, someone got 65.7/120? How do you get 65.7 and not 65 or 66 or even 65.5?
Lazarus said:Unfortunately, no.
The above post will be updated with additional statistics if/when they become available.
morgue said:Ok I'm a little confused...Do we ever know our raw mark (the mark we got in the actually HSC)? Or is it written when we get our HSC marks back?
Also I have scenario: Say I got around the 50 per cent mark in all my school assessments for Mathematics. Then I get to the HSC and only get 38% and the rest of my class either get around the same mark as I did or they get even lower marks. Does this HSC exam mark get scaled or something? If so, does it increase or decrease?
Technically, you're not 'suing' the Board - they haven't done anything wrong.Cactus said:The only way to find out you raw marks is to sue the BOS under the Freedom of Information Act, in other words it's not easy.
It's really quite easy. The Board has provided a form that can simply be filled out and sent in:Cactus said:how would one go about getting our raw marks from the BOS?