Lets do this the easy way shall we.View attachment 34726
Part ii please i get (-(1)^n x 2^n x n!)/(2n+1)!
wdym mx2 hes gonna destroy uni at this rate lmaoThis beast hasn't even started yr 11 yet
He's gonna destroy mx2
Be careful of making such prophesies for one needs to let the person learn at their own rate and not be pressured unfairly. What you say might not occur and he might burn out if he does not know what he is doing.wdym mx2 hes gonna destroy uni at this rate lmao
Wise wordsBe careful of making such prophesies for one needs to let the person learn at their own rate and not be pressured unfairly. What you say might not occur and he might burn out if he does not know what he is doing.
This beast hasn't even started yr 11 yet
He's gonna destroy mx2
Aww thank you guyswdym mx2 hes gonna destroy uni at this rate lmao
not intended as a prophecy as implied from the casual tone/punctuation but more of a hyperbolic compliment to demonstrate my appreciation of his effort but I understand where you're coming from. If it was taken or subtly felt as I was expecting him to be the next euler, newton... then apologies for that.Be careful of making such prophesies for one needs to let the person learn at their own rate and not be pressured unfairly. What you say might not occur and he might burn out if he does not know what he is doing.
Yeah its been a joy just seeing qs from you, regardless of however you perform you should be really proud of yourself for going above and beyondAww thank you guys
Well, that is fine. I am not getting mad, just a word of caution.not intended as a prophecy as implied from the casual tone/punctuation but more of a hyperbolic compliment to demonstrate my appreciation of his effort. If it was taken or subtly felt as I was placing my bets on him being the next Euler or Newton by uni then my apologies.
Yeah its been a joy just seeing qs from you, regardless of however you perform you should be really proud of yourself for going above and beyond
Yeah ik just mb if it came off that way because that wasnt my intentWell, that is fine. I am not getting mad, just a word of caution.
Oh you are going to have to do a lot of integration by parts for thatAlternatively if you wanted do it the hard way...
using we can just continually evaluate to get
Looking at the denominator, it almost appears like (2n+1)! but it seems to be going down by 2s skipping all the even numbers. So we can add the even numbers by multiplying the numeratpr and denominator by the 'missing' set of numbers, to get (2n+1)!