Removal of Conics from Syllabus (2 Viewers)

[gurmies]

^ god dammit, I can't wait to do uni maths..

 

[coolcat6778]

HSC is hopeless....
look at what they have done to all science courses..

thank god i will be finishing it this year...

the ultimate aim is to wipe out the vast asian population in uni by removing harder math and includes harder english..thats what they trying to do.. u guys are out-of-the-point.. they are NOT trying to teach anything in HSC. the ultimate aim of the HSC is to select student to the uni and they are goin to be protective and keep all the native [white] australians to the best advantagable position possible...

This is the truest statement in BoS. Fuck the 2024 physics exam which was 90% a shitty writing test. I'm actually so mad a retard who's clearly fucking shit at maths (didn't even get a band 6) could score a higher exam mark in physics just cause this shitty exam gave an advantage to those good at shitty hsc english rather than maths unlike other years. My responses weren't wrong, even the teacher agrees, yet the marker marked me 1/5 for a question (reciting a shitty proton parrafin wax experiment) cause of the structure or some shit. How is it even allowed? Why on earth does NESA think physics needs to be a shitty qualitative subject, when in uni and everywhere else (vce etc), it's a quantitative subject? Like we already have shitty biology and chemistry as qualitative subjects (which girls enjoy for some reason)

 

[Tony Stark]

This is the truest statement in BoS. Fuck the 2024 physics exam which was 90% a shitty writing test. I'm actually so mad a retard who's clearly fucking shit at maths (didn't even get a band 6) could score a higher exam mark in physics just cause this shitty exam gave an advantage to those good at shitty hsc english rather than maths unlike other years. My responses weren't wrong, even the teacher agrees, yet the marker marked me 1/5 for a question (reciting a shitty proton parrafin wax experiment) cause of the structure or some shit. How is it even allowed? Why on earth does NESA think physics needs to be a shitty qualitative subject, when in uni and everywhere else (vce etc), it's a quantitative subject? Like we already have shitty biology and chemistry as qualitative subjects (which girls enjoy for some reason)

I agree with this. The whole point of physics is to predict and decribe the world with numbers. Anyone can describe some thing with qualities, but quantities are always more specific. Like, why would I have to describe to you with my eyes, the whole point of knowing physics is to calculate physics and to understand how it works, not to bloody write a story on why Einstein is the hottest guy alive

 

[coolcat6778]

I agree with this. The whole point of physics is to predict and decribe the world with numbers. Anyone can describe some thing with qualities, but quantities are always more specific. Like, why would I have to describe to you with my eyes, the whole point of knowing physics is to calculate physics and to understand how it works, not to bloody write a story on why Einstein is the hottest guy alive
View attachment 48244

this is one of the many "reciting the textbook" questions i got 1 mark on.

Also 2024 is the only new syllabus physics paper with the last questions not being quantitative. The very last 2024 question is a shitty pendulum "describe and analyse qualitatively" question, which clearly the markers marked based on structure

Compare the VCE physics exams to HSC physics exam, the difference is clear. One makes you write shitty 10 lines per nearly every question while one tests you on actual physics (and math) by asking you to calculate stuff

If NESA is adding shitty subjective qualitative questions so they can make the mark distribution have a lower average, then they should just make the syllabus harder and ask actual hard quantitative questions. Nobody would do physics if they didn't actually like math then, which is suppose to be the way it is. The girls and stupid boys can FUCK OFF and do chemistry and biology instead