impervious182
Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
- Messages
- 634
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
Says who?Trefoil said:Actually, trivia: New Zealand immigrants are some of the hardest and most down-to-earth workers in Australia.
Says who?Trefoil said:Actually, trivia: New Zealand immigrants are some of the hardest and most down-to-earth workers in Australia.
Fuck off. You're the same guy who thinks the Large Hadron Collider is evil and that Obama is a terrorist.alexdore993 said:Says who?
Both taken out of context and overly simplified. I neither said Obama was a terrorist or that the Hadron Collider was evil, nor inferred either.Trefoil said:Fuck off. You're the same guy who thinks the Large Hadron Collider is evil and that Obama is a terrorist.
Moron.
They're not moving to sydney because their middle east 'camel dollars' aren't worth squat. They can't afford houses in Sydney.d3vilz said:i think Rudd's main priority in the short term (with the global economic crisis) should be:
- bringing skilled workers (carpenters, construction,etc.) to help build the new infrastructure projects that is needed, and fix the current bottlenecks.
- bringing more people with professional skills (e.g doctors, pharmacists, medical background, teaching etc.) to work in Australia. without a doubt there are shortages in the area of education & health, so retrain them or update their skills if necessary.
1) by building the infrastructure, we will be able to use its services, which in turn will stimulate the economy.
- entice more migrants, who want to establish their business here.
2) a good education = qualification/s = employment = producing goods or services = economic growth
MY CONCERN:
if more and more people move to Sydney, it will furthermore add more pressure on current infrastructure and hence it will bottleneck the current system even more.
more people in Sydney =
- more traffic congestion
- more people on the current crappy public transport system
- more pressure on hospitals
- more pressure on schools
etc....
Yeah you said Obama was pally with terrorists and loved America's death and you posted utterly unfounded retarded shit about the LHC.alexdore993 said:Both taken out of context and overly simplified. I neither said Obama was a terrorist or that the Hadron Collider was evil, nor inferred either.
Yes you did[...]alexdore993 said:Both taken out of context and overly simplified. I neither said Obama was a terrorist or that the Hadron Collider was evil, nor inferred either.
Check your jewmailTrefoil said:Yes you did, you dopey cunt.
You dont increase immigration in tough economic times - you wind it back. If there are jobless 'Australians' they will resent having to compete for jobs with highly skilled immigrants, and then something like Hansonism or the White Australia policy kicks in againd3vilz said:i think Rudd's main priority in the short term (with the global economic crisis) should be:
- bringing skilled workers (carpenters, construction,etc.) to help build the new infrastructure projects that is needed, and fix the current bottlenecks.
- bringing more people with professional skills (e.g doctors, pharmacists, medical background, teaching etc.) to work in Australia. without a doubt there are shortages in the area of education & health, so retrain them or update their skills if necessary.
1) by building the infrastructure, we will be able to use its services, which in turn will stimulate the economy.
- entice more migrants, who want to establish their business here.
2) a good education = qualification/s = employment = producing goods or services = economic growth
MY CONCERN:
if more and more people move to Sydney, it will furthermore add more pressure on current infrastructure and hence it will bottleneck the current system even more.
more people in Sydney =
- more traffic congestion
- more people on the current crappy public transport system
- more pressure on hospitals
- more pressure on schools
etc....