henry3 said:
this is quite possibly the most retarded convo ever especially with any notion related to the bmi im 6'3 or 191cm and im 125kg and am apparently 34.3 lol and am apparently quite obese but im still several times more athletic then many of school mates who are more then likely ur low 20's in ur bmi.
On this tangent it would also appear that being thin is not nescessarily 'better' and mole rat ugly is far worse then being overweight cus i can lose 20kg but you cant change your backwards arse ulgy face
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
(with out excessive expense)!!!!! so suck on that lol
Comprehension. Use it.
The is basically 1 or 2 mentions of BMI. We immediately talk about how BMI sucks. High BMI does not mean FAT. Hell, you can have a low BMI and be fat. And you are not 'apparently 34.3' you ARE 34.3; but it doesn't mean anything.
Also, you mention 'being thin'. Thin never came into this conversation either, we are talking about FAT. There is a different between thin and lean. Lean is low body fat, thin is a skinny person. While i would say that is remotely better than fat, it still not something i would want to be.
If you were as fit as you say you are (hey, I'm not calling you out on it...), you SHOULDN'T be able to loose 20kg. If you have 20kg to loose, you are fat. I am 105kg, but i sure as hell couldn't find 20kg on my body to loose. Hell, if i absolutely stretched myself to 10kg lost (a lot of which would be water), i would be bodybuilding 'ripped' stage ready. Then probably die.
I pity you for making this as your first post.