Terlob
Member
Why did you post then. Im sure everyone here knows your opinion by nowrunnable said:7 = A. But lets not talk about this.
Why did you post then. Im sure everyone here knows your opinion by nowrunnable said:7 = A. But lets not talk about this.
Same reason as you posting.Terlob said:Why did you post then. Im sure everyone here knows your opinion by now
agreed.Terlob said:Why did you post then. Im sure everyone here knows your opinion by now
But you're being an arrogant wanker. Apart from your first few posts you havn't added anything to the discussion, just tried to make yourself look smarter than the rest of us.runnable said:This forum is for discussion.
Its not as if we are trolling.
I'm was pointing out whats right and whats wrong and discuss. Unless someone proves me wrong, its not as if what I said was invalid. You calling me an arrogant wanker just shows that you've ran out of logical things to say. So thanks.Terlob said:But you're being an arrogant wanker. Apart from your first few posts you havn't added anything to the discussion, just tried to make yourself look smarter than the rest of us.
you have been pwned and it has been comprehensively proven true that C is the answer yet you still insist that "7 = A"runnable said:7 = A. But lets not talk about this. Wait for the official answer.
agreed once againTerlob said:But you're being an arrogant wanker. Apart from your first few posts you havn't added anything to the discussion, just tried to make yourself look smarter than the rest of us.
ronash said:you have been pwned and it has been comprehensively proven true that C is the answer yet you still insist that "7 = A"
and its not only on this thread either, you have realised the fallacies in your arguement in the question 7 thread as well, claiming that you will be right come january.
but its your opinion so thats ok.
Terlob said:But you're being an arrogant wanker. Apart from your first few posts you havn't added anything to the discussion, just tried to make yourself look smarter than the rest of us.
wrong word...more like general consensusrunnable said:Proven by who? Who knows the 100% right answer and told us? Proven by you?
Well quite obviously general consensus is not nearly always right. Whats more, its hardly a general consensus here.ronash said:wrong word...more like general consensus
Nah man, when you move to a decentralised system, there is less government intervention hence less protection for workers, wages fall.Rix123 said:7 is definately C - how can u think its A - its soooo easy!!!!
first unemployment can go below NAIRU - non accelerating rate of inflation. therefore unemployment below NAIRU adds to inflation and obviously if its below NAIRU then unemployment has gone down initially (the q says initially) and therefore if its below NAIRU it will cause INFLATION.
With 8 - did anyone get D? not coz its the right answer but because none of the other ones were because:
decentralised -
imporves labour mobility
increases inequality
increases inflationary pressures as government can't fix wages below or to inflation and so relies on market forces.
decentralised usually increases wages so therefore reduces international competitiveness
Does anyone agree or see the logic?
but thats the thing!!!!Garygaz said:Nah man, when you move to a decentralised system, there is less government intervention hence less protection for workers, wages fall.
Also with question 7, as there is more aggregate demand, that pretty much means eco growth, which means hidden unemployed rejoin the workforce and initially add to the unemployment rate. Though it's a stupid question, both answers can be argued.
It does immediately reduce hidden unemployment. Day 1: Oh its good growth now. Day 2: Lets go look for a job.ronash said:but thats the thing!!!!
hidden unemployment does not immediately reduce as soon as there is an increase in aggregate demand so you cannot argue that it initially adds to the unemployment rate
Eh, i shouldn't be doing this i've got ext 1 tomorrow but anywhooz.ronash said:but thats the thing!!!!
hidden unemployment does not immediately reduce as soon as there is an increase in aggregate demand so you cannot argue that it initially adds to the unemployment rate
Dimplez said:You articulated why I said A really well Garygaz
gut yaself ya onkgrahrunnable said:Well quite obviously general consensus is not nearly always right. Whats more, its hardly a general consensus here.