Share your 2013 HSC results here (2 Viewers)

Lina3

Lina3

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
507
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
asianese said:
He meant languages with small, abnormally strong cohorts.
Click to expand...
Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.
 
Last edited:
asianese

asianese

Σ
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Lina3 said:
Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.
Click to expand...
You're mixing up alignment and scaling again.
 
SuchSmallHands

SuchSmallHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
1,391
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Lina3 said:
Really? My careers adviser gave us one example where in one year, 8 people did Swedish or something and since the lowest mark was 94, they scaled it DOWN. Don't they need to create a bell curve (ie they can't just have everyone at the top, but need some at the bottom and most in the middle)? Gosh, the more I try to understand this system the more confused I get.
Click to expand...
I got the same speech but with Dutch! I think he meant the languages like Classical Greek extension which seem like something no one would ever do and then they go ahead and outscale 4U maths, I just pointing out that there are other languages which aren't so obscure that are doing pretty well for themselves in terms of scaling, like French.
 
Samir97

Samir97

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
109
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Mathematics 98/100 (20th in state)
Mathematics X1 48/50
Biology 92
 
S

Santaisfake96

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
3
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Hey guys,
Im a year 11 student who did the HSC 2 unit maths course as part of an accelerated maths program. Unfortunately i found 4 unit too time consuming so dropped back to 3 u maths. Now my 2u HSC mark comes into play. I got band. 6 with HSC mark of 92 in 2u maths which has an atar equivalent of 97.1 according to coaching school atar calculators. Im worried that next year's 2 unit will be easier and hence it might be lower than 97.1, or will this 97.1 be fixed in along with my other atar equivalents for other subjects for my averaged ATAR next year no matter wtf goes on next year?
 
iJimmy

iJimmy

not dead
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
1,594
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
the test cannot be much easier than any other, BOS can't make tests easier than others, all are equally the same in difficulty. (most cases)
 
S

Santaisfake96

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
3
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Ok, but will that 97.1 atar equivalent be fixed in no matter what, i.e, my ATAR average will have included 97.1?
 
R

Randox

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
356
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
iJimmy said:
the test cannot be much easier than any other, BOS can't make tests easier than others, all are equally the same in difficulty. (most cases)
Click to expand...
Not exactly true... This years 2 unit test was the hardest since 2003 imo and is reflected by the aligning. Last years 2 unit test was one of the easiest ones and needed a much higher raw to get a band 6. The cut off for this year looks like 75/100 while last years was 84/100.
 
iJimmy

iJimmy

not dead
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
1,594
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
what was band 6 cutoff for 2013 and 2012?
 
R

Randox

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
356
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Santaisfake96 said:
Ok, but will that 97.1 atar equivalent be fixed in no matter what, i.e, my ATAR average will have included 97.1?
Click to expand...
You are using last years data to get to that number (unless you used an atar calc which used the very recently produced tables bu UAC). Anyway you should keep that atar equivalent but I'm not 100% sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top