MedVision ad

Simple induction question (which i cannot do!!!) (2 Viewers)

sasquatch

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
384
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Just a question...

Write a formula for the sum of the first n multiples of 4 and use the method of mathematical induction to prove your formula true.

This is what ive done so far!

Sn = 4 + 8 + 12 + 16 + ... + 4n

T2 - T1 = 8 - 4 = 4
T3 - T2 = 16 - 12 = 4

T2 - T1 = T3 - T2

Therefore series is an arithmetic series.

So this is all ive done!!

Do i try to prove that the formula above equals to n/2[2a + (n-1)d] (the sum of n terms for an arithmetic series)? Or yeah.. thats what im thinking.. but not 100% sure.

Thanks.
 

sasquatch

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
384
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
:( I cant go on until someone answers this question... guess everyone is studying for their half yearlies.......I DID MINE TWO WEEKS AGO!!!!!!!!!!
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
You've only been waiting an hour. Be patient, and people will help when they can.

Write a formula for the sum of the first n multiples of 4
I'm going to use sigma notation for this. I think I've gotten the notation right - if I haven't, please tell.

1Σn 4n = n/2[8 + 4(n-1)] (you have to equate the sum to the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series, substituting in values as you can).

use the method of mathematical induction to prove your formula true.
Step 1: Prove true for n = 1. Pretty easy.


Step 2. Assume true for n = k:

1Σn 4k = k/2[8 + 4(k-1)]


Step 3: Prove true for n = k+1

1Σk+1 4(k+1) = (k+1)/2[8 + 4k]

LHS: 1Σk 4k + 4(k+1)

= k/2[8 + 4(k-1)] + 4k + 4 (from assumption)

= 4k + 2k(k-1) + 4k + 4

= 2k2 + 6k + 4

RHS: 4(k+1) + 2k(k+1)

= 4k + 4 + 2k2 + 2k

= 2k2 + 6k + 4

= LHS

Therefore, since true for n=1, and true for n=k+1 if true for n=k, is true for all n≥1 by mathematical induction.
 
Last edited:

sasquatch

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
384
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
erm i understood to use induction.. and i can use induction.. all i was asking was if i was to try and prove taht the formula that i provided (which is exactly the same as the formula you represeneted by sigma notion) equals to the sum of an arithemetic series.

Thanks anyway.... and i wasnt angry or anything... think you misinterperated the "emotion" in my post... erm yeah..thanks
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
sasquatch said:
erm i understood to use induction.. and i can use induction.. all i was asking was if i was to try and prove taht the formula that i provided (which is exactly the same as the formula you represeneted by sigma notion) equals to the sum of an arithemetic series.

Thanks anyway.... and i wasnt angry or anything... think you misinterperated the "emotion" in my post... erm yeah..thanks
Sorry about that. At least I answered your question. :p


I_F
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top