simultaneity (1 Viewer)

table for 1

dreaming... sigh...
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Messages
608
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
sorry i took so long to reply, i needed a break from physics, well, from school altogether.

to zeropoint: thanks for being so patient with me, and helping me to understand simutaneity !! i get simutaneity, but yeah, i'll just cut out the doors. -.-" i have a feeling i'm going to be coming here soon with more annoying questions...

to KFunk: thanks for the website, it explains wanton-wonton's example in more detail, i'm sure i'll need the site as a reference ! =D
 

AntiHyper

Revered Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
1,103
Location
Tichondrius
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
How about if there's a "moving tunnel" in space that's travelling near the speed of light in the direction of 'x'.
And a vehicle travels in the tunnel near the speed of light in respect to the tunnel in the direction of 'x'.
What speed will it have as it leaves the tunnel?

I'd say physically it'd move faster than light but it can't gauge its speed by looking at its surroundings. Instead the people in the vehicle would see 'the moon' to be somewhat cookie sized thickness. By doing this the world 'becomes' a smaller place so that anyone always 'judge' speed to be below the speed of light.
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Thank you Wanton, it is intended to be a most truly funky signature.


AntiHyper, you're thinking in terms of newtonian non-relativistic mechanics there. You need to use the formulas of special relativity when calculating relative velocities at such high speeds. To quote a website:
( http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html )




Suppose an object A is moving with a velocity v relative to an object B and B is moving with a velocity u (in the same direction) relative to an object C. What is the velocity of A relative to C?
v
u -------> A
-------> B


In non-relativistic mechanics the velocities are simply added and the answer is that A is moving with a velocity w = u+v relative to C. But in special relativity the velocities must be combined using the formula

w = (u + v)/(1 + uv/c2)
 

wanton-wonton

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
1,415
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
AntiHyper said:
How about if there's a "moving tunnel" in space that's travelling near the speed of light in the direction of 'x'.
And a vehicle travels in the tunnel near the speed of light in respect to the tunnel in the direction of 'x'.
What speed will it have as it leaves the tunnel?

I'd say physically it'd move faster than light but it can't gauge its speed by looking at its surroundings. Instead the people in the vehicle would see 'the moon' to be somewhat cookie sized thickness. By doing this the world 'becomes' a smaller place so that anyone always 'judge' speed to be below the speed of light.
wanton-wonton said:
I don't know what you're talking about, but when referring to relative velocity of high velocities, e.g. near the speed of light, you use the equation as follows:

combined velocity = (v1 + v2)/(1+v1v2/c^2)

E.g., if a space ship is travelling at 0.9 towards another space ship also travelling at 0.9c, the relative speed of one space ship to another is not 1.8 c, instead, use the equation.
You might've missed it....Same as KFUNK's post basically.
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You need to question things if you are to understand them, if we didn't question things we would still be in the stone age.

Also note that post had been answered, nearly a month ago.
 

pinto

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2005
Messages
5
Location
mid north coast, nsw
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hi, i understand all the thought experiments and why they work, however if you were to ask me "What is the principle of relativity?" or "what is special relativity?" or "what is the relativity of simultaneity"i couldnt answer, i could only give examples. could someone please help me with a defn of each?
 

davo_

good kid
Joined
May 13, 2004
Messages
348
Location
Canberra/West Wyalong
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I can say you won't get a question directly asking you that... And you can't really answer "what is the theory of relativity?" with a simple statement- to describe what you need to know about the theory just try to know your dot points and you should be fine.
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
You'd probably be best off citing the central postulates of relativity then giving a couple of their implications.

1. First postulate (principle of relativity)

The laws of the universe are the same regardless of inertial frame of reference.

2. Second postulate (invariance of c)

The speed of light in vacuum is the same to all inertial observers, is the same in all directions, and does not depend on the velocity of the object emitting the light.

From these basic principles of relativity you can derive all the √(1 - v2/c2) equations that you use.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top