mitch_f1
Member
Hey
Just doing some questions from the textbook for nuclear chemistry (conquering chemistry 4th edn-HSC) and I came across a question that says:
'By comparing each of the following ioptopes with data for the element in the perioidic table, decide whether you wouldexpect it to be stable or not. Give your reason. Which, if any would you expect to be beta emitters"
For this question i used the zone of stability data (if Z<20 then n: p = 1.0, if Z=50 n: p = 1.3, if Z=80 n: p = 1.5, Z>83 instable)
In the question it lists 138,56 Ba, and 35,18 Ar, amongst many others.
The answers say that 138,56 Ba is stable, but it's n: p is 1.46 (putting it outside the zone of stability), and the answers say that 35,18 Ar is unstable, but it's n: p = 0.9 (putting it well inside zone of stability).......is this just a typo, or am I missing something.
Also, from the data given (atomic mass, atomic number, element name) how are you able to predict their ability to be beta/alpha emitters???
Thanks
Mitch
Just doing some questions from the textbook for nuclear chemistry (conquering chemistry 4th edn-HSC) and I came across a question that says:
'By comparing each of the following ioptopes with data for the element in the perioidic table, decide whether you wouldexpect it to be stable or not. Give your reason. Which, if any would you expect to be beta emitters"
For this question i used the zone of stability data (if Z<20 then n: p = 1.0, if Z=50 n: p = 1.3, if Z=80 n: p = 1.5, Z>83 instable)
In the question it lists 138,56 Ba, and 35,18 Ar, amongst many others.
The answers say that 138,56 Ba is stable, but it's n: p is 1.46 (putting it outside the zone of stability), and the answers say that 35,18 Ar is unstable, but it's n: p = 0.9 (putting it well inside zone of stability).......is this just a typo, or am I missing something.
Also, from the data given (atomic mass, atomic number, element name) how are you able to predict their ability to be beta/alpha emitters???
Thanks
Mitch