same..i wrote divergent evolution as wellShuter said:I think it wanted something along the lines of divergent evolution, due to different environments, at least that's what I put.
I don't think so, you couldn't really say a specific one, so I didn't mention any. I think it mainly wanted you to outline how divergent evolution happens - e.g. the climate will be different, slight different characteristics would become better suited in the different colonies, leading to eventually two very different species.em_516 said:same..i wrote divergent evolution as well
do you think they wanted specific examples of how it would change though?
How do plants behave? Is that like opening and closing stomates?silvermoon said:the difference in environments would lead to different physical, behavoural etc. characteristics
ahh good..i did the same..i thought i could have written examples but i wasn't really sure..so..yeh..i just mentioned generally that they'd change due to different environment etc. etc.Shuter said:I don't think so, you couldn't really say a specific one, so I didn't mention any. I think it mainly wanted you to outline how divergent evolution happens - e.g. the climate will be different, slight different characteristics would become better suited in the different colonies, leading to eventually two very different species.
I do believe it asked you to relate it to Darwin/Wallace's theory of evolution.Tommy_Lamp said:mygot, i dont think that "wallace's line" is necessary
I think it was referring more to adaptive radiation and divergent evolution.myg0t said:I do believe it asked you to relate it to Darwin/Wallace's theory of evolution.
Wallace's theory of evolution = Wallace's line = Biogeography.