Phanatical
Happy Lala
In sex ed classes, they didn't even mention in passing that Abstinence was the right thing to do. They should, because Abstinence is the Only way to prevent putting a mother-to-be in the position of having an abortion.
Fact is, a 16 year old Isn't mature enough to decide whether to have an abortion or not. There are ramifications to both carrying a child to term and aborting, ramifications which a 16 year old is not mentally mature enough to understand. I suggest the age of 18 merely because this is the age at which society feels that a person must take legal responsibility for their own actions. I don't see why a 16 year old isn't responsible enough to sign a legal contract, yet that same 16 year old is responsible enough to create a new life.
So what's the difference between a 16 year old and a 26 year old in that situation? The 26 year old is legally culpable for her own actions. The 26 year old is, by society's judgement, mature enough to enter into a legal contract, mature enough to vote, mature enough to take out a home loan, mature enough to donate blood. The 26 year old is also in a better position to consider the ramifications of whichever action she takes.
My argument therefore is that society should be actively encouraging abstinence. 16 year olds shouldn't be placed in a situation where they have to consider aborting, or bringing their own child to term. The best solution to this problem is not to have created the problem at all, and the only way that's going to happen is through promoting abstinence.
Fact is, a 16 year old Isn't mature enough to decide whether to have an abortion or not. There are ramifications to both carrying a child to term and aborting, ramifications which a 16 year old is not mentally mature enough to understand. I suggest the age of 18 merely because this is the age at which society feels that a person must take legal responsibility for their own actions. I don't see why a 16 year old isn't responsible enough to sign a legal contract, yet that same 16 year old is responsible enough to create a new life.
So what's the difference between a 16 year old and a 26 year old in that situation? The 26 year old is legally culpable for her own actions. The 26 year old is, by society's judgement, mature enough to enter into a legal contract, mature enough to vote, mature enough to take out a home loan, mature enough to donate blood. The 26 year old is also in a better position to consider the ramifications of whichever action she takes.
My argument therefore is that society should be actively encouraging abstinence. 16 year olds shouldn't be placed in a situation where they have to consider aborting, or bringing their own child to term. The best solution to this problem is not to have created the problem at all, and the only way that's going to happen is through promoting abstinence.