Heipmaster said:The HSC is unfair because it dominates your life and determines your income within the next 30-40 years.
lol, wrong. You can transfer between/in unis.
Heipmaster said:The HSC is unfair because it dominates your life and determines your income within the next 30-40 years.
That is wrong. You can still get any job you want if you are prepared to work for it. It may just require an alternative pathway into that career instead of the normal hsc>>>uni>>>job path that I assume you are imagining.Heipmaster said:The HSC is unfair because it dominates your life and determines your income within the next 30-40 years.
With that attitude it will.Heipmaster said:The HSC is unfair because it dominates your life and determines your income within the next 30-40 years.
While some ppl may disagree with this as it IS a little (hem) pessimistic, I think that sometimes there's nothing better than coming to terms with the realism of a situation.Heipmaster said:The HSC is unfair because it dominates your life and determines your income within the next 30-40 years.
not for my courseMonstar said:lol, wrong. You can transfer between/in unis.
the level of fairness of the hsc does not depend entirely on attitudewatatank said:With that attitude it will.
Agreed, but that's not the point I was making. I think that the HSC in the end is just a bridge, for many people the easiest path to success for them. But it's not the only one. To say the HSC is unfair because it determines your income for the next 30-40 years is unjustified. People who have the attitude that the HSC determines their career path for the next 30-40 years WILL let the HSC rule their lives and let it choose their career path for them and the level of income etc.f3nr15 said:the level of fairness of the hsc does not depend entirely on attitude
It's a means to an end.ON a different note, what about the people who don't put in the effort for a high UAI, yet pay their way into uni through full fee paying?
That reminds me of what so many people in my life are telling me right now, that it's no big deal I didn't get the marks I wanted because I can just start lower and transfer my way up. While that is mostly true if you put the time and effort in, you're right that it's just not as easy as people make it out to be. There is a huge difference between being optimistic and then just being totally unrealistic, and it is really frustrating when people begin to act like there isn't a reason to be disappointed when you don't acheive the marks you wanted.hannahxxx said:Yes-you can transfer into courses-but most unis will determine whether or not you are eligible for this based on 50/50 UAI and course grades. Hence, trying to convince someone with a low UAI that they'll be able to study what they want at uni "if they just work hard" for 2 semesters is unprecedented and unrealistic. People who are this optimistic should become acquainted with the real world.
I agree, I think that 4 little points just isn't enough in many cases. I had a friend who wanted to get into vet science at uni, but went through a really traumatic family experience during his HSC that affected his marks to a great extent. The few little UAI points weren't enough to get him into his course so he missed out, when he was someone who was capable of getting the marks and deserved to get in. My UAI was more than 30 points less than what I'd have been aiming for had I not being sick the past few years, so the 4 or 5 points consideration are meaningless because they're not going to help me get into uni. I guess those who don't apply for the EAS, like I almost didn't because I thought it was pointless etc, did have the opportunity but chose not to take it so they can't really complain in the end. Its just not fair on the ones who may not have been aware they could apply.hannahxxx said:MY friend had to undergo a court case against her father for child abuse this year, which cut into a good proportion of her HSC study time. There was a lot of enotional trauma that she experienced because of the case. For her, the extra 4 points through EAS means absolutely nothing. What about those kids who go through hell during their HSC year (in terms of domestic abuse, family deaths or depression) who DON'T come forward for EAS ?
I guess it does seem really unfair, but then again what about the people who worked really hard, just missed out on the cut off for their course but then have the opportunity to get in under full fee paying? Sure its not fair on those who don't have the money to do so but there isn't anything in life that's entirely fair.hannahxxx said:ON a different note, what about the people who don't put in the effort for a high UAI, yet pay their way into uni through full fee paying?
I'm not entirely sure about that! I mean, my dad finished his HSC in 1979 and got into uni but didn't go because he was an ethnic migrant and didn't know any better. And the worst part is, back then it was free! Of course times have changed and there's more demand blahblah but I fail to see where paying $26 000 per year for some uni degrees comes into play in the duration of your studies. Kinda reminds me of private schools.Sprinkles~ said:and the universities probably do need the money to keep running.
Watatank your advice is very sound and spot on. I hope all those who have just finished there HSC or will be in year 12 next year listen. It maybe hard for those who will begin their HSC next year to hear this because right now they have people left, right and center putting pressure on them and telling them the HSC is the be all or end all. In time all you 17 and 18 year olds will have a different perpective of the HSC and it will be nothing more to you than a bad dream. I hope you gain some comfort from what I am about to tell you though because I was once in your position and felt exactly the same way.watatank said:Agreed, but that's not the point I was making. I think that the HSC in the end is just a bridge, for many people the easiest path to success for them. But it's not the only one. To say the HSC is unfair because it determines your income for the next 30-40 years is unjustified. People who have the attitude that the HSC determines their career path for the next 30-40 years WILL let the HSC rule their lives and let it choose their career path for them and the level of income etc.
Those with the attitude that they can do better than what their UAI suggests they are capable of will find an alternative pathway to do what they want (or something better anyway) and won't let the UAI affect the outcome. I believe you haven't finished year 12 yet? IN time you will understand this too.
It's a means to an end.