The primitive of xtan(x) (1 Viewer)

Captain pi

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
433
Location
Port Macquarie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
If anyone has a coherent proof for the result found @ http://integrals.wolfram.com/ after computation of the integral of x*Tan[x], I would be very grateful if he could post it.

Please note Trev: if you copy the infra proof, you will have to explain it to the class before I award you $15.
 
Last edited:

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
PolyLogs would have to be substantially beyond what you know, right?

But even then it's astoundingly simple:

Since we know that:

d/dx PolyLog[2,-(e^2ix)] = 2i * Sum[n=1,infinity] [(e^(2inx)/n) * (-1)^n]
 
Last edited:

Trev

stix
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
2,037
Location
Pine Palace, St. Lucia, Brisbane.
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Captain pi said:
Please note Trev: if you copy the infra proof, you will have to explain it to the class before I award you $15.
Haha, I saw this thread and knew it was you!
So you expect me to read up on 'polylogs' and whatnot, and even then after all that effort - explain it to the class. HP, you know how much of a crap public speaker I am :p
Hmmm, I'll have a go! :eek:
 

Trev

stix
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
2,037
Location
Pine Palace, St. Lucia, Brisbane.
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Wait, looking at the brief example
"d/dx PolyLog[2,-(e^2ix)] = 2i * Sum[n=1,infinity] [(e^(2inx)/n) * (-1)^n]"
I have already been confused, and have decided I won't bother, haha. I'll tell someone else to and make them suffer :p
 

Captain pi

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
433
Location
Port Macquarie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
KeypadSDM said:
PolyLogs would have to be substantially beyond what you know, right?

But even then it's astoundingly simple:

Since we know that:

d/dx PolyLog[2,-(e^2ix)] = 2i * Sum[n=1,infinity] [(e^(2inx)/n) * (-1)^n]
My dear Thomas, I don't even know how to differentiate complex numbers (bows head in shame), let alone call myself amongst the 'we' you so confidently assumed above.

Could you expand (tremendously) on this proof? Could you file a .pdf? Or, at least, give me some reading material?

Love,

pi.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top