The Three Year RUle (1 Viewer)

[toknblackguy]

well apparently, they say they cover the entire syllabus in three years, meaning that if we were to take the last 2 exams, and mark off every single point they've covered so far, we'll end up with the hsc exam!

only problem is i'm too lazy
and besides, they'll still overlap on the more basic stuff

 

[Ragerunner]

Not worth taking the risk.

You never know what these crazy board of studies people will do

 

[sepul]

Is it three years ? I know in bio it's 5 - where they have to examine certain dot points over the 5 year period, meaning there will be a lot still common in each exam.

At the moment I'm going over the '01 and '02 exams and preparing answers for the multiple mark Q's

 

[+:: $i[Q]u3 ::+]

mm.. doubt it's worth the bother. Predicting questions is a bit ~ when u realise they're gonna be testing most of it anyway (unless it's like that stupid phys exam.. stupid..) so yeh.. jus.. know everything? hehehe...

 

[mercury]

Actually I'm going to do that... my teacher mentioned that too.
But it's always good to cover everything.

 

[eeyore]

but then also, if a question answered poorly one year, the might reuse it coz it's hard

 

[toknblackguy]

well i've been told that the three year rule usually applies to the 6-8 markers for all subjects...
meh

 

[Exeter]

i doubt it, theres so many things they havent tested
me and some friends mapped out the previous 2 years and ticked off the dot points that they tested
theres still much more to be tested

 

[toknblackguy]

wow
hey exeter!

 

[Shoey]

It's actually a five year rule, but there is definitely going to be some overlap in what questions they select this year compared to the last two years.

Count on a titration question being in there somewhere...